Firm profile
Tarter Krinsky & Drogin
Atlas has observed Tarter Krinsky & Drogin in 1 market across New York City.
A sourced business description has not been added yet. Assistant mentions alone do not verify the firm's services.
Observed appearances in this market
Each market has its own date and sample; there is no overall firm rank. Other roles and raw appearances are separate from primary recommendations; counts must not be added together.
Latest published rankings (1)
Immigration Law New York City · Legal Rank #54 · 1.2% mention rate ±0.8 Oct 21, 2026 Details +Close −
824 responses · 2/4 model families · Oct 21, 2026
Historical raw appearances · all roles
Named in 29 distinct assistant responses.
Aug 22, 2026 – Oct 20, 2026. Raw appearances do not establish a qualified primary rank or recommendation rate.
Buyer questions and AI answers
Simulated buyer questions from Atlas’s test dataset, paired with AI answers that mentioned this firm or professional. Open to see the questions and what was said.
29 AI answers with recorded context · 0 reviewed in context
Atlas asks AI assistants questions written from the perspective of people seeking services in a particular city and situation. Each example connects a simulated buyer question to an answer that named this firm or professional. A name can appear as a recommendation, a related adviser, a comparison, or even an option the assistant advises against.
A mention does not verify services, eligibility or suitability. Context review explains how the name was used; it does not verify the assistant’s claims. Explore the test questions and methodology.
Simulated buyer question · Immigration Law · New York City · Legal Everyone knows Wildes & Weinberg in New York City for celebrity O-1s. If I'm NOT a celebrity — just an executive at a mid-cap company with a complicated O-1 — d... openai/gpt-4o 2026-10-20 23:57:54 How the name appeared: Uncertain Open question and AI answer
What the simulated buyer asked
Everyone knows Wildes & Weinberg in New York City for celebrity O-1s. If I'm NOT a celebrity — just an executive at a mid-cap company with a complicated O-1 — do they actually pay attention to my case, or is the A-list work the only thing the partners touch?
…ss of the client’s status. For alternatives, consider:
- Fragomen, Del Rey, Bernsen & Loewy LLP - Known for comprehensive immigration services for corporate executives.
- Tarter Krinsky & Drogin LLP - Offers tailored immigration solutions for businesses and executives.
- Cyrus D. Mehta & Partners PLLC - Specializes in complex immigration cases, including O-1 visas for business professionals.
How to read this mention
The role of this name in the answer is uncertain or has not been reviewed.
Unreviewed contextual evidence; no qualification established.
Market: Immigration Law · New York City · Legal
Factual accuracy: unverified · Practice fit: unknown
Context review: unreviewed. This is separate from practice eligibility and ranking.
No source URLs were recorded for this answer.
Simulated buyer question · Immigration Law · New York City · Legal Is Cyrus D. Mehta & Partners actually any good for employment-based immigration in New York City, or are they coasting on reputation? Anyone with direct experie... openai/gpt-4o 2026-10-20 23:44:55 How the name appeared: Uncertain Open question and AI answer
What the simulated buyer asked
Is Cyrus D. Mehta & Partners actually any good for employment-based immigration in New York City, or are they coasting on reputation? Anyone with direct experience?
…ve global reach and comprehensive immigration services. 2. Berry Appleman & Leiden LLP - Offers strong corporate immigration services and innovative technology solutions. 3. Tarter Krinsky & Drogin LLP - Recognized for their tailored approach to business immigration needs.
How to read this mention
The role of this name in the answer is uncertain or has not been reviewed.
Unreviewed contextual evidence; no qualification established.
Market: Immigration Law · New York City · Legal
Factual accuracy: unverified · Practice fit: unknown
Context review: unreviewed. This is separate from practice eligibility and ranking.
No source URLs were recorded for this answer.
Simulated buyer question · Immigration Law · New York City · Legal VP at a FAANG in New York City, comp north of $1.5M, currently on H-1B with priority date stuck for years. Company will sponsor EB-1C; I also qualify for EB-1A... perplexity/sonar 2026-10-20 23:39:21 How the name appeared: Uncertain Open question and AI answer
What the simulated buyer asked
VP at a FAANG in New York City, comp north of $1.5M, currently on H-1B with priority date stuck for years. Company will sponsor EB-1C; I also qualify for EB-1A on my own (patents, papers, press). Who in NYC files both tracks in parallel for execs at this level — not the in-house panel firm that's slow-walking my I-140?
…of Keshab Raj Seadie P.C.** — New York firm explicitly handling EB-1A and EB-1C among core employment-based green card matters; good fit for a parallel-track strategy. [2]
- Tarter Krinsky & Drogin — Edwin M. Hernández García — Partner in a NYC immigration practice who routinely handles both EB-1A and EB-1C for individuals and multinational corporate clients. [4]
- Michaeli Legal Group P.C. — Maxim Michaeli — NYC-based firm focused on executives, entrepreneurs, and complex immigration matters, with employment-based green card work…
How to read this mention
The role of this name in the answer is uncertain or has not been reviewed.
Unreviewed contextual evidence; no qualification established.
Market: Immigration Law · New York City · Legal
Factual accuracy: unverified · Practice fit: unknown
Context review: unreviewed. This is separate from practice eligibility and ranking.
No source URLs were recorded for this answer.
Selected examples from the test dataset are shown here. Excerpts show part of an answer; full response records remain part of the audit. Each market has its own question set and sample, so these examples do not establish an overall rank.
See which prompts name your firm.
Compare the questions that name your firm, the peers mentioned instead, and the assistants’ original responses.