Immigration Law / New York City
Tarter Krinsky & Drogin
How to read this firm's data
How to read this firm's data
Header tiles
- Rank
- Position among businesses named in the latest scan.
- Mention rate
- The share of eligible AI responses in the current ranking that named the business.
Charts
- Rank trend
- Each dot is one published ranking, newest on the right. A flat line means this firm's rank didn't move.
- Per-AI breakdown
- Responses from each assistant that named this firm.
- By question type
- Mentions grouped by what the buyer was asking.
Practice context for Immigration Law · Not yet reviewed
A sourced business description has not been added yet. Assistant mentions alone do not verify the firm's services.
Practice eligibility has not been reviewed for this market. This is unknown, not an exclusion.
Practice evidence and AI measurements are assessed separately. Mentions do not establish suitability.
Market detail: Immigration Law · New York City
Position
#54
of 813 firms · Oct 21, 2026
Mention rate
1.2%
10 of 824 eligible responses
Rank vs mention rate
5 snapshots · 53 days
Rank ranged #54 to #166 · mention rate 0.4%–1.2%
How to read this chart
How to read: each dot is one snapshot. The green line is where this firm ranked among peers on that day. The dashed amber line is the mention rate — the share of AI responses in that snapshot that named this firm at all.
Rank and mention rate use different scales, so the two lines are placed side-by-side, not on top of each other. A firm can hold rank while mention rate drifts (fewer responses named anyone) or improve rank without moving mention rate (peers dropped out).
Research details Historical appearances, assistant counts and question types · all roles, separate from qualified recommendations.
All-time results for this market
Business appeared Aug 22, 2026–Oct 20, 2026
- Responses analyzed
- 9,672
- Responses naming business
- 29
- Historical appearance rate
- 0.3%
- Dates with published rank
- 6
These raw appearance totals cover all retained responses for this city and category, across all question types and roles, including sources and incidental mentions. They are not qualified recommendation counts. Appearance dates show when responses named this business; published rank dates can include repeated use of those responses. Current rank and confidence use the latest dated ranking.
Per-AI breakdown
Counts cover all published Atlas research for this market.
- Claude
- 0 mentions
- ChatGPT
- 17 mentions
- Gemini
- 0 mentions
- Perplexity
- 12 mentions
By question type
All-time mentions grouped by the type of question the buyer asked.
- Validation
- 2 mentions
- Situation
- 8 mentions
- Follow Up
- 5 mentions
- Decision
- 13 mentions
- Advice
- 1 mention
Peer firms in New York City immigration law
Current ranks and mention rates · Oct 21, 2026 edition.
#1
Fragomen, Del Rey, Bernsen & Loewy, LLP
35.4% current mention rate · 4/4 AI
#2
Klasko Immigration
26.2% current mention rate · 4/4 AI
#3
Cyrus D. Mehta & Partners, PLLC
23.4% current mention rate · 4/4 AI
#4
BAL (Berry Appleman & Leiden LLP)
21.4% current mention rate · 4/4 AI
#5
Wildes & Weinberg P.C Law Offices
19.4% current mention rate · 4/4 AI
#6
Fragomen
13.7% current mention rate · 4/4 AI
#7
Murthy Law Offices
12.1% current mention rate · 4/4 AI
#8
Greenberg Traurig, LLP
9.2% current mention rate · 4/4 AI
Unclaimed listing — claim this profile
Atlas created this profile after AI assistants named the business. Claim it to confirm the business details; we'll reply from support@viclaro.app.
Buyer questions and AI answers
Simulated buyer questions from Atlas’s test dataset, paired with AI answers that mentioned this firm or professional. Open to see the questions and what was said.
29 AI answers with recorded context · 0 reviewed in context
Atlas asks AI assistants questions written from the perspective of people seeking services in a particular city and situation. Each example connects a simulated buyer question to an answer that named this firm or professional. A name can appear as a recommendation, a related adviser, a comparison, or even an option the assistant advises against.
A mention does not verify services, eligibility or suitability. Context review explains how the name was used; it does not verify the assistant’s claims. Explore the test questions and methodology.
Simulated buyer question · Immigration Law · New York City · Legal Everyone knows Wildes & Weinberg in New York City for celebrity O-1s. If I'm NOT a celebrity — just an executive at a mid-cap company with a complicated O-1 — d... openai/gpt-4o 2026-10-20 23:57:54 How the name appeared: Uncertain Open question and AI answer
What the simulated buyer asked
Everyone knows Wildes & Weinberg in New York City for celebrity O-1s. If I'm NOT a celebrity — just an executive at a mid-cap company with a complicated O-1 — do they actually pay attention to my case, or is the A-list work the only thing the partners touch?
…ss of the client’s status. For alternatives, consider:
- Fragomen, Del Rey, Bernsen & Loewy LLP - Known for comprehensive immigration services for corporate executives.
- Tarter Krinsky & Drogin LLP - Offers tailored immigration solutions for businesses and executives.
- Cyrus D. Mehta & Partners PLLC - Specializes in complex immigration cases, including O-1 visas for business professionals.
How to read this mention
The role of this name in the answer is uncertain or has not been reviewed.
Unreviewed contextual evidence; no qualification established.
Market: Immigration Law · New York City · Legal
Factual accuracy: unverified · Practice fit: unknown
Context review: unreviewed. This is separate from practice eligibility and ranking.
No source URLs were recorded for this answer.
Simulated buyer question · Immigration Law · New York City · Legal Is Cyrus D. Mehta & Partners actually any good for employment-based immigration in New York City, or are they coasting on reputation? Anyone with direct experie... openai/gpt-4o 2026-10-20 23:44:55 How the name appeared: Uncertain Open question and AI answer
What the simulated buyer asked
Is Cyrus D. Mehta & Partners actually any good for employment-based immigration in New York City, or are they coasting on reputation? Anyone with direct experience?
…ve global reach and comprehensive immigration services. 2. Berry Appleman & Leiden LLP - Offers strong corporate immigration services and innovative technology solutions. 3. Tarter Krinsky & Drogin LLP - Recognized for their tailored approach to business immigration needs.
How to read this mention
The role of this name in the answer is uncertain or has not been reviewed.
Unreviewed contextual evidence; no qualification established.
Market: Immigration Law · New York City · Legal
Factual accuracy: unverified · Practice fit: unknown
Context review: unreviewed. This is separate from practice eligibility and ranking.
No source URLs were recorded for this answer.
Simulated buyer question · Immigration Law · New York City · Legal VP at a FAANG in New York City, comp north of $1.5M, currently on H-1B with priority date stuck for years. Company will sponsor EB-1C; I also qualify for EB-1A... perplexity/sonar 2026-10-20 23:39:21 How the name appeared: Uncertain Open question and AI answer
What the simulated buyer asked
VP at a FAANG in New York City, comp north of $1.5M, currently on H-1B with priority date stuck for years. Company will sponsor EB-1C; I also qualify for EB-1A on my own (patents, papers, press). Who in NYC files both tracks in parallel for execs at this level — not the in-house panel firm that's slow-walking my I-140?
…of Keshab Raj Seadie P.C.** — New York firm explicitly handling EB-1A and EB-1C among core employment-based green card matters; good fit for a parallel-track strategy. [2]
- Tarter Krinsky & Drogin — Edwin M. Hernández García — Partner in a NYC immigration practice who routinely handles both EB-1A and EB-1C for individuals and multinational corporate clients. [4]
- Michaeli Legal Group P.C. — Maxim Michaeli — NYC-based firm focused on executives, entrepreneurs, and complex immigration matters, with employment-based green card work…
How to read this mention
The role of this name in the answer is uncertain or has not been reviewed.
Unreviewed contextual evidence; no qualification established.
Market: Immigration Law · New York City · Legal
Factual accuracy: unverified · Practice fit: unknown
Context review: unreviewed. This is separate from practice eligibility and ranking.
No source URLs were recorded for this answer.
Selected examples from the test dataset are shown here. Excerpts show part of an answer; full response records remain part of the audit. Each market has its own question set and sample, so these examples do not establish an overall rank.
Field notes on reading these rankings
Turn this ranking into a decision.
Get the complete competitive gap, the public evidence behind it, and the three changes worth testing first.
Request the competitive brief →