New York City · Finance
Wealth Management
How to read the rankings
How to read the rankings
Columns
- Rank
- Position in the ranking within the latest snapshot.
- Mentions
- Latest-snapshot AI responses that named this business.
- Response mention rate (±margin)
- Mentions ÷ latest-snapshot AI responses. The ± is the 95% confidence margin.
- Per-AI columns
- Responses from each assistant that named the business; together they sum to Mentions.
The independent record of which businesses ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Perplexity put on the shortlist when New York City buyers describe what they need.
Model versions and response counts
openai/gpt-4o: 282 · perplexity/sonar: 282 · google/gemini-2.5-flash: 282 · anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.6: 282
Viclaro Atlas
A Viclaro publication · viclaro.app
All-time Wealth Management results
AI responses analyzed
7,916
of 96,898 across Atlas · 8.2%
Business mentions
30,244
of 403,245 across Atlas · 7.5%
Businesses named over time
4,836
of 34,867 across Atlas · 14%
Buyer questions tested
141
of 1,616 across Atlas · 8.7%
Published snapshots
7
of 177 across Atlas · 4.0%
Businesses ranked
1,350
in the latest snapshot
These totals cover all published Wealth Management research. The current ranking uses 1,128 eligible AI responses from Sep 27, 2026.
Filters this ranking only. Use Atlas search above to search every market.
| #Rank | Business | HitsMentions | RateResponse mention rate | Clauden=282 | ChatGPTn=282 | Geminin=282 | Perplexityn=282 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1 |
Bessemer Trust Private Wealth Management New York NY
Claude 56
ChatGPT 48
Gemini 3
Perplexity 10
|
117 | 10.4% ±1.8 | 56 | 48 | 3 | 10 |
| #2 |
|
105 | 9.3% ±1.7 | 70 | 29 | 2 | 4 |
| #3 |
|
104 | 9.2% ±1.7 | 19 | 17 | 66 | 2 |
| #4 |
|
94 | 8.3% ±1.6 | 29 | 21 | 39 | 5 |
| #5 |
|
87 | 7.7% ±1.6 | 18 | 28 | 8 | 33 |
| #6 |
|
83 | 7.4% ±1.5 | 4 | 33 | 33 | 13 |
| #7 |
|
78 | 6.9% ±1.5 | 35 | 25 | 16 | 2 |
| #8 |
|
66 | 5.9% ±1.4 | 32 | 22 | 0 | 12 |
| #9 |
|
56 | 5.0% ±1.3 | 12 | 21 | 8 | 15 |
| #10 |
|
56 | 5.0% ±1.3 | 39 | 5 | 6 | 6 |
| #11 |
|
49 | 4.3% ±1.2 | 5 | 19 | 21 | 4 |
| #12 |
|
48 | 4.3% ±1.2 | 6 | 12 | 23 | 7 |
| #13 |
|
45 | 4.0% ±1.2 | 3 | 25 | 13 | 4 |
| #14 |
|
45 | 4.0% ±1.2 | 28 | 16 | 1 | 0 |
| #15 |
|
44 | 3.9% ±1.1 | 3 | 3 | 11 | 27 |
| #16 |
|
41 | 3.6% ±1.1 | 18 | 1 | 20 | 2 |
| #17 |
|
38 | 3.4% ±1.1 | 15 | 8 | 14 | 1 |
| #18 |
|
38 | 3.4% ±1.1 | 1 | 28 | 6 | 3 |
| #19 |
|
37 | 3.3% ±1.1 | 3 | 13 | 17 | 4 |
| #20 |
|
37 | 3.3% ±1.1 | 22 | 0 | 14 | 1 |
| #21 |
|
37 | 3.3% ±1.1 | 1 | 0 | 35 | 1 |
| #22 |
Modera Wealth Management
Claude 33
ChatGPT 0
Gemini 0
Perplexity 4
|
37 | 3.3% ±1.1 | 33 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| #23 |
|
36 | 3.2% ±1.0 | 3 | 0 | 6 | 27 |
| #24 |
|
35 | 3.1% ±1.0 | 7 | 11 | 10 | 7 |
| #25 |
|
35 | 3.1% ±1.0 | 15 | 17 | 3 | 0 |
Ranks #26–#100 (75 more businesses) click to expand
| #26 | 35 mentions · 3.1% · 3/4 AIs | |
| #27 | 34 mentions · 3.0% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #28 | 33 mentions · 2.9% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #29 | 32 mentions · 2.8% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #30 | 32 mentions · 2.8% · 3/4 AIs | |
| #31 | 31 mentions · 2.8% · 3/4 AIs | |
| #32 | 28 mentions · 2.5% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #33 | 28 mentions · 2.5% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #34 | 28 mentions · 2.5% · 3/4 AIs | |
| #35 | 27 mentions · 2.4% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #36 | 27 mentions · 2.4% · 1/4 AIs | |
| #37 | 26 mentions · 2.3% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #38 | 26 mentions · 2.3% · 3/4 AIs | |
| #39 | 26 mentions · 2.3% · 2/4 AIs | |
| #40 | 25 mentions · 2.2% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #41 | 25 mentions · 2.2% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #42 | 25 mentions · 2.2% · 2/4 AIs | |
| #43 | 24 mentions · 2.1% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #44 | 24 mentions · 2.1% · 3/4 AIs | |
| #45 | 22 mentions · 2.0% · 2/4 AIs | |
| #46 | 22 mentions · 2.0% · 1/4 AIs | |
| #47 | 21 mentions · 1.9% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #48 | 21 mentions · 1.9% · 3/4 AIs | |
| #49 | 20 mentions · 1.8% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #50 | 20 mentions · 1.8% · 3/4 AIs | |
| #51 | 19 mentions · 1.7% · 3/4 AIs | |
| #52 | 19 mentions · 1.7% · 3/4 AIs | |
| #53 | 18 mentions · 1.6% · 3/4 AIs | |
| #54 | 17 mentions · 1.5% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #55 | 17 mentions · 1.5% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #56 | 17 mentions · 1.5% · 3/4 AIs | |
| #57 | 17 mentions · 1.5% · 3/4 AIs | |
| #58 | 17 mentions · 1.5% · 1/4 AIs | |
| #59 | 17 mentions · 1.5% · 1/4 AIs | |
| #60 | 16 mentions · 1.4% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #61 | 16 mentions · 1.4% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #62 | 16 mentions · 1.4% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #63 | 16 mentions · 1.4% · 2/4 AIs | |
| #64 | 16 mentions · 1.4% · 2/4 AIs | |
| #65 | 15 mentions · 1.3% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #66 | 15 mentions · 1.3% · 3/4 AIs | |
| #67 | 15 mentions · 1.3% · 2/4 AIs | |
| #68 | 14 mentions · 1.2% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #69 | 14 mentions · 1.2% · 3/4 AIs | |
| #70 | 14 mentions · 1.2% · 2/4 AIs | |
| #71 | 14 mentions · 1.2% · 1/4 AIs | |
| #72 | 13 mentions · 1.2% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #73 | 13 mentions · 1.2% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #74 | 13 mentions · 1.2% · 3/4 AIs | |
| #75 | 13 mentions · 1.2% · 3/4 AIs | |
| #76 | 13 mentions · 1.2% · 3/4 AIs | |
| #77 | 13 mentions · 1.2% · 3/4 AIs | |
| #78 | 13 mentions · 1.2% · 2/4 AIs | |
| #79 | 13 mentions · 1.2% · 2/4 AIs | |
| #80 | 13 mentions · 1.2% · 2/4 AIs | |
| #81 | 13 mentions · 1.2% · 1/4 AIs | |
| #82 | 12 mentions · 1.1% · 3/4 AIs | |
| #83 | 12 mentions · 1.1% · 3/4 AIs | |
| #84 | 12 mentions · 1.1% · 2/4 AIs | |
| #85 | 12 mentions · 1.1% · 2/4 AIs | |
| #86 | 11 mentions · 1.0% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #87 | 11 mentions · 1.0% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #88 | 11 mentions · 1.0% · 3/4 AIs | |
| #89 | 11 mentions · 1.0% · 2/4 AIs | |
| #90 | 11 mentions · 1.0% · 2/4 AIs | |
| #91 | 11 mentions · 1.0% · 1/4 AIs | |
| #92 | 11 mentions · 1.0% · 1/4 AIs | |
| #93 | 11 mentions · 1.0% · 1/4 AIs | |
| #94 | 10 mentions · 0.9% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #95 | 10 mentions · 0.9% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #96 | 10 mentions · 0.9% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #97 | 10 mentions · 0.9% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #98 | 10 mentions · 0.9% · 3/4 AIs | |
| #99 | 10 mentions · 0.9% · 3/4 AIs | |
| #100 | 10 mentions · 0.9% · 2/4 AIs |
1,250 additional firms beyond rank 100 available via the JSON API (requires atlas API token).
No firms in this ranking match that search.
Request a scan
Don't see your firm above?
Most firms are tracked below the top 25 shown here — try the search bar at the top of the page first (Cmd+K). If your firm hasn't been scanned yet, tell us who you are and we'll add it. Result lands in your inbox, no account required.
Thanks — we've got your request.
We'll scan the assistants for your business and email the results to the address you gave. Usually within a week; sometimes faster if we're already scanning your vertical.
Sources cited by AI
Directories, associations, and other sources
These sources appeared in AI answers as places to research, verify, or compare businesses. We show them here because they helped shape the answers.
1. NAPFA
57 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
2. Garrett Planning Network
40 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
3. XY Planning Network
34 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
4. SEC Investment Adviser Public Disclosure (IAPD)
27 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
5. FINRA BrokerCheck
25 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
6. Forbes
8 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
7. Zoe Financial
zoefinancial.com
7 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
8. NerdWallet
6 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
9. Harness Wealth
harness.co
6 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
10. Wealthramp
5 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
11. feeonlynetwork.com
2 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
12. CFP Board
2 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
13. Wealthtender
1 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
14. Financial Therapy Association
1 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
15. Garrett Planning Network
1 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
16. SmartAsset
1 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
17. NY Attorney General's investor protection bureau
1 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
18. WiserAdvisor
wiseradvisor.com
1 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
19. NYC Department of Consumer and Worker Protection
1 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
20. Investment Adviser Association
insuranceap.com
1 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
These sources can reveal where buyers and AI assistants research the market. Source mentions are reported separately from business rankings.
In-depth report
How AI recommends Wealth Management in New York City
A written breakdown of the current snapshot — which firms each assistant names, how concentrated the recommendations are, and what a buyer would actually see if they asked ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini or Perplexity today.
Further reading
Pillar guide
AI Search Rankings: A 2026 Guide
How AI search rankings work and how to read a response-mention-rate leaderboard.
Playbook
How to Rank in ChatGPT
The exact structure and language that makes an AI reuse your firm as an answer.
Concepts
Generative Engine Optimization (GEO)
GEO vs AEO vs SEO — definitions, metrics, and limitations.
Field notes on reading these rankings
All notes →How to Read AI Search Rankings (Beyond Vanity Metrics)
AI search rankings measure how often assistants like ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Perplexity name a business when a buyer asks who to hire. Read for share of vo...
How to Write Content That AI Assistants Actually Cite
Content that AI assistants cite looks different from content designed for humans or Google. It answers the buyer's exact question in a single quotable sentence,...
Why AI Recommendations Change Between Runs (and When a Change Is Real)
An assistant is not a laminated directory. Search results move, generated wording varies, and a tiny prompt edit can change the shortlist. The answer is not to...
Don't see your business? Or ranked low?
See which prompts and assistants omit your business, then measure the effect of site changes.
Get a free AI visibility audit →Methodology v1.0 · latest snapshot: 1,128 AI responses and 5,192 business mentions · all-time corpus: 7,916 responses and 30,244 business mentions · Sep 27, 2026. 95% confidence intervals. Full methodology: viclaro.app/leaderboards/methodology.