New York City · Legal
Estate Planning
How to read the rankings
How to read the rankings
Columns
- Rank
- Position in the ranking within the latest snapshot.
- Mentions
- Latest-snapshot AI responses that named this business.
- Response mention rate (±margin)
- Mentions ÷ latest-snapshot AI responses. The ± is the 95% confidence margin.
- Per-AI columns
- Responses from each assistant that named the business; together they sum to Mentions.
The independent record of which businesses ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Perplexity put on the shortlist when New York City buyers describe what they need.
Model versions and response counts
openai/gpt-4o: 282 · perplexity/sonar: 282 · google/gemini-2.5-flash: 282 · anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.6: 282
Viclaro Atlas
A Viclaro publication · viclaro.app
All-time Estate Planning results
AI responses analyzed
11,254
of 96,898 across Atlas · 12%
Business mentions
46,183
of 403,245 across Atlas · 11%
Businesses named over time
4,242
of 34,867 across Atlas · 12%
Buyer questions tested
141
of 1,616 across Atlas · 8.7%
Published snapshots
16
of 177 across Atlas · 9.0%
Businesses ranked
1,275
in the latest snapshot
These totals cover all published Estate Planning research. The current ranking uses 1,128 eligible AI responses from Oct 7, 2026.
Filters this ranking only. Use Atlas search above to search every market.
| #Rank | Business | HitsMentions | RateResponse mention rate | Clauden=282 | ChatGPTn=282 | Geminin=282 | Perplexityn=282 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1 |
Greenberg Traurig, LLP
Claude 4
ChatGPT 5
Gemini 142
Perplexity 4
|
155 | 13.7% ±2.0 | 4 | 5 | 142 | 4 |
| #2 |
McLaughlin & Stern LLP
Claude 0
ChatGPT 20
Gemini 103
Perplexity 5
|
128 | 11.3% ±1.9 | 0 | 20 | 103 | 5 |
| #3 |
|
107 | 9.5% ±1.7 | 0 | 10 | 87 | 10 |
| #4 |
Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP
Claude 1
ChatGPT 78
Gemini 19
Perplexity 5
|
103 | 9.1% ±1.7 | 1 | 78 | 19 | 5 |
| #5 |
|
100 | 8.9% ±1.7 | 48 | 13 | 31 | 8 |
| #6 |
|
98 | 8.7% ±1.7 | 53 | 23 | 20 | 2 |
| #7 |
Pierro, Connor & Strauss, LLC
Claude 49
ChatGPT 8
Gemini 6
Perplexity 32
|
95 | 8.4% ±1.6 | 49 | 8 | 6 | 32 |
| #8 |
|
95 | 8.4% ±1.6 | 75 | 11 | 9 | 0 |
| #9 |
|
92 | 8.2% ±1.6 | 29 | 41 | 17 | 5 |
| #10 |
Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP
Claude 5
ChatGPT 17
Gemini 44
Perplexity 19
|
85 | 7.5% ±1.5 | 5 | 17 | 44 | 19 |
| #11 |
|
72 | 6.4% ±1.4 | 25 | 39 | 5 | 3 |
| #12 |
Littman Krooks LLP
Claude 12
ChatGPT 25
Gemini 21
Perplexity 13
|
71 | 6.3% ±1.4 | 12 | 25 | 21 | 13 |
| #13 |
|
62 | 5.5% ±1.3 | 0 | 8 | 45 | 9 |
| #14 |
Morgan Legal Group
Claude 0
ChatGPT 2
Gemini 0
Perplexity 54
|
56 | 5.0% ±1.3 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 54 |
| #15 |
|
53 | 4.7% ±1.2 | 0 | 46 | 1 | 6 |
| #16 |
New York Legacy Lawyers by Yana Feldman & Associates PLLC
Claude 21
ChatGPT 2
Gemini 5
Perplexity 23
|
51 | 4.5% ±1.2 | 21 | 2 | 5 | 23 |
| #17 |
|
48 | 4.3% ±1.2 | 17 | 8 | 20 | 3 |
| #18 |
|
47 | 4.2% ±1.2 | 4 | 26 | 12 | 5 |
| #19 |
|
44 | 3.9% ±1.1 | 13 | 13 | 16 | 2 |
| #20 |
Stroock & Stroock & Lavan LLP
Claude 39
ChatGPT 0
Gemini 0
Perplexity 0
|
39 | 3.5% ±1.1 | 39 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| #21 |
|
36 | 3.2% ±1.0 | 4 | 20 | 9 | 3 |
| #22 |
|
36 | 3.2% ±1.0 | 0 | 3 | 27 | 6 |
| #23 |
Lamson & Cutner, P.C.
Claude 30
ChatGPT 4
Gemini 0
Perplexity 0
|
34 | 3.0% ±1.0 | 30 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| #24 |
|
34 | 3.0% ±1.0 | 30 | 0 | 4 | 0 |
| #25 |
|
33 | 2.9% ±1.0 | 8 | 16 | 9 | 0 |
Ranks #26–#100 (75 more businesses) click to expand
| #26 | 32 mentions · 2.8% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #27 | 32 mentions · 2.8% · 2/4 AIs | |
| #28 | 31 mentions · 2.8% · 2/4 AIs | |
| #29 | 30 mentions · 2.7% · 2/4 AIs | |
| #30 | 28 mentions · 2.5% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #31 | 27 mentions · 2.4% · 3/4 AIs | |
| #32 | 26 mentions · 2.3% · 2/4 AIs | |
| #33 | 25 mentions · 2.2% · 3/4 AIs | |
| #34 | 24 mentions · 2.1% · 3/4 AIs | |
| #35 | 24 mentions · 2.1% · 2/4 AIs | |
| #36 |
Law Office of Inna Fershteyn and Associates, P.C.
brooklyntrustandwill.com
23 mentions · 2.0% · 4/4 AIs
|
23 mentions · 2.0% · 4/4 AIs |
| #37 | 22 mentions · 2.0% · 1/4 AIs | |
| #38 | 21 mentions · 1.9% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #39 | 20 mentions · 1.8% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #40 | 20 mentions · 1.8% · 3/4 AIs | |
| #41 | 20 mentions · 1.8% · 3/4 AIs | |
| #42 | 20 mentions · 1.8% · 2/4 AIs | |
| #43 | 20 mentions · 1.8% · 2/4 AIs | |
| #44 | 20 mentions · 1.8% · 2/4 AIs | |
| #45 | 19 mentions · 1.7% · 2/4 AIs | |
| #46 | 17 mentions · 1.5% · 3/4 AIs | |
| #47 | 16 mentions · 1.4% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #48 | 16 mentions · 1.4% · 3/4 AIs | |
| #49 | 16 mentions · 1.4% · 2/4 AIs | |
| #50 | 16 mentions · 1.4% · 1/4 AIs | |
| #51 | 16 mentions · 1.4% · 1/4 AIs | |
| #52 | 14 mentions · 1.2% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #53 | 14 mentions · 1.2% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #54 | 14 mentions · 1.2% · 1/4 AIs | |
| #55 | 13 mentions · 1.2% · 2/4 AIs | |
| #56 | 13 mentions · 1.2% · 1/4 AIs | |
| #57 | 12 mentions · 1.1% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #58 |
Abrams, Fensterman, Fensterman, Fisher, Formato & Einiger, LLP
Unverified
12 mentions · 1.1% · 3/4 AIs
|
12 mentions · 1.1% · 3/4 AIs |
| #59 | 12 mentions · 1.1% · 2/4 AIs | |
| #60 | 12 mentions · 1.1% · 2/4 AIs | |
| #61 | 12 mentions · 1.1% · 2/4 AIs | |
| #62 | 12 mentions · 1.1% · 2/4 AIs | |
| #63 | 11 mentions · 1.0% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #64 | 11 mentions · 1.0% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #65 | 11 mentions · 1.0% · 3/4 AIs | |
| #66 | 11 mentions · 1.0% · 2/4 AIs | |
| #67 | 11 mentions · 1.0% · 2/4 AIs | |
| #68 | 11 mentions · 1.0% · 1/4 AIs | |
| #69 | 11 mentions · 1.0% · 1/4 AIs | |
| #70 | 11 mentions · 1.0% · 1/4 AIs | |
| #71 | 10 mentions · 0.9% · 3/4 AIs | |
| #72 | 10 mentions · 0.9% · 2/4 AIs | |
| #73 | 10 mentions · 0.9% · 2/4 AIs | |
| #74 | 10 mentions · 0.9% · 2/4 AIs | |
| #75 | 10 mentions · 0.9% · 2/4 AIs | |
| #76 | 10 mentions · 0.9% · 2/4 AIs | |
| #77 | 10 mentions · 0.9% · 1/4 AIs | |
| #78 | 9 mentions · 0.8% · 3/4 AIs | |
| #79 | 9 mentions · 0.8% · 2/4 AIs | |
| #80 | 9 mentions · 0.8% · 1/4 AIs | |
| #81 | 8 mentions · 0.7% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #82 | 8 mentions · 0.7% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #83 | 8 mentions · 0.7% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #84 | 8 mentions · 0.7% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #85 | 8 mentions · 0.7% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #86 | 8 mentions · 0.7% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #87 | 8 mentions · 0.7% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #88 | 8 mentions · 0.7% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #89 | 8 mentions · 0.7% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #90 | 8 mentions · 0.7% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #91 | 8 mentions · 0.7% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #92 | 8 mentions · 0.7% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #93 | 8 mentions · 0.7% · 3/4 AIs | |
| #94 | 8 mentions · 0.7% · 3/4 AIs | |
| #95 | 8 mentions · 0.7% · 2/4 AIs | |
| #96 | 8 mentions · 0.7% · 1/4 AIs | |
| #97 | 8 mentions · 0.7% · 1/4 AIs | |
| #98 | 8 mentions · 0.7% · 1/4 AIs | |
| #99 | 8 mentions · 0.7% · 1/4 AIs | |
| #100 | 8 mentions · 0.7% · 1/4 AIs |
1,175 additional firms beyond rank 100 available via the JSON API (requires atlas API token).
No firms in this ranking match that search.
Request a scan
Don't see your firm above?
Most firms are tracked below the top 25 shown here — try the search bar at the top of the page first (Cmd+K). If your firm hasn't been scanned yet, tell us who you are and we'll add it. Result lands in your inbox, no account required.
Thanks — we've got your request.
We'll scan the assistants for your business and email the results to the address you gave. Usually within a week; sometimes faster if we're already scanning your vertical.
Sources cited by AI
Directories, associations, and other sources
These sources appeared in AI answers as places to research, verify, or compare businesses. We show them here because they helped shape the answers.
1. Surrogate’s Court
24 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
2. Martindale
15 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
3. Best Lawyers
15 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
4. Avvo
12 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
5. Super Lawyers
10 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
6. New York State Bar Association Lawyer Referral Service
6 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
7. NYC Bar Association
5 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
8. NYC Supreme Court
4 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
9. New York Supreme Court
new york supreme court
4 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
10. Justia
4 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
11. NYC Family Court
2 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
12. Yelp
2 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
13. Manhattan Family Court
2 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
14. The LGBT Bar Association of Greater New York
2 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
15. Chambers High Net Worth
2 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
16. Hispanic National Bar Association
2 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
17. Article 81 Supreme Court
article 81 supreme court
1 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
18. Zocdoc
1 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
19. Asian American Bar Association of New York
1 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
20. Chinese-American Planning Council
1 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
21. XY Planning Network
1 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
22. American Agricultural Law Association
1 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
23. New York State Court System
1 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
24. FeeOnlyNetwork
1 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
25. Lesbian & Gay Law Association Foundation
1 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
These sources can reveal where buyers and AI assistants research the market. Source mentions are reported separately from business rankings.
In-depth report
How AI recommends Estate Planning in New York City
A written breakdown of the current snapshot — which firms each assistant names, how concentrated the recommendations are, and what a buyer would actually see if they asked ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini or Perplexity today.
Further reading
Pillar guide
AI Search Rankings: A 2026 Guide
How AI search rankings work and how to read a response-mention-rate leaderboard.
Playbook
How to Rank in ChatGPT
The exact structure and language that makes an AI reuse your firm as an answer.
Concepts
Generative Engine Optimization (GEO)
GEO vs AEO vs SEO — definitions, metrics, and limitations.
Field notes on reading these rankings
All notes →Why Your Law Firm Can Rank in Google and Still Be Invisible to ChatGPT
Google rankings reward pages built for keywords. AI recommendations reward pages that answer a buyer situation clearly enough to be reused in an answer.
How to Read AI Search Rankings (Beyond Vanity Metrics)
AI search rankings measure how often assistants like ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Perplexity name a business when a buyer asks who to hire. Read for share of vo...
How to Write Content That AI Assistants Actually Cite
Content that AI assistants cite looks different from content designed for humans or Google. It answers the buyer's exact question in a single quotable sentence,...
Don't see your business? Or ranked low?
See which prompts and assistants omit your business, then measure the effect of site changes.
Get a free AI visibility audit →Methodology v1.0 · latest snapshot: 1,128 AI responses and 4,810 business mentions · all-time corpus: 11,254 responses and 46,183 business mentions · Oct 7, 2026. 95% confidence intervals. Full methodology: viclaro.app/leaderboards/methodology.