New York City · Personal Injury
Gair, Gair, Conason, Rubinowitz, Bloom, Hershenhorn, Steigman & Mackauf
How to read this firm's data
How to read this firm's data
Header tiles
- Rank
- Position among firms named in the category's latest scan.
- Named in
- How many of the snapshot's AI responses named this business, out of how many were run. One response = one prompt put to one assistant once. The percentage is the same figure normalised so categories with different response counts can be compared; ±X is the 95% confidence margin.
- Cited by
- How many of the four AI assistants named this firm at least once.
Breakdowns + log
- Rank trend
- Each dot is one category snapshot, newest on the right. Shown once two or more snapshots exist; a flat line means this firm's rank didn't move.
- Per-AI breakdown
- Responses from each assistant that named this firm.
- By question type
- Citations grouped by what the buyer was asking.
- Citation log
- Every recorded instance where an AI named this firm.
Is this your firm?
Get a private ranking brief showing which buyer questions AI assistants answer with Gair, Gair, Conason, Rubinowitz, Bloom, Hershenhorn, Steigman & Mackauf — and which they answer with a competitor instead. Emailed from support@viclaro.app within one business day. See a sample →
Rank
#2
of 726 firms
Named in
329 of 832
AI responses · 39.5% ±3.3%
Cited by
4/4
Rank vs mention rate
8 snapshots · 58 days
Rank ranged #1 to #2 · mention rate 8.0%–39.5%
How to read: each dot is one snapshot. The green line is where this firm ranked among peers on that day. The dashed amber line is the mention rate — the share of AI responses in that snapshot that named this firm at all.
Rank and mention rate use different scales, so the two lines are placed side-by-side, not on top of each other. A firm can hold rank while mention rate drifts (fewer responses named anyone) or improve rank without moving mention rate (peers dropped out).
Per-AI breakdown
Counts show how many responses from each assistant named this firm.
Claude
of 208 responses
128
mentions
ChatGPT
of 208 responses
24
mentions
Gemini
of 208 responses
115
mentions
Perplexity
of 208 responses
62
mentions
By question type
Citations split by buyer-intent category. Empty rows = AI doesn't think of this firm when buyers ask that kind of question.
Longitudinal evidence · all retained runs
All-time Atlas record
Observed Jun 26, 2026–Aug 22, 2026
Responses analyzed
2,230
Responses naming firm
544
Lifetime mention rate
24.4%
Published snapshots ranked
20
These totals span every retained response for this exact city and category, including historical prompt-set versions. They describe accumulated evidence, not the firm's current rank. The cards above and per-AI breakdown use only the dated current snapshot; the history chart compares compatible published snapshots.
Citation log
329 distinct AI responses named this business in the current snapshot. This log is intentionally snapshot-scoped; the all-time record above summarizes the complete longitudinal corpus.
Where Gair, Gair, Conason, Rubinowitz, Bloom, Hershenhorn, Steigman & Mackauf is winning + missing, prompt-by-prompt
23 of 104 ranking-layer buyer prompts don't cite this firm. The table lists the three most-cited firms for each missing prompt. Prompt text is redacted (see prompt-set methodology).
P-001
Decision
P-002
Decision
Firms cited on this prompt:
P-003
Follow Up
Firms cited on this prompt:
P-004
Situation
Firms cited on this prompt:
P-005
Validation
Firms cited on this prompt:
P-006
Validation
Firms cited on this prompt:
P-007
Validation
Firms cited on this prompt:
P-008
Validation
Firms cited on this prompt:
P-009
Decision
Firms cited on this prompt:
P-010
Decision
Firms cited on this prompt:
P-011
Follow Up
Firms cited on this prompt:
P-012
Situation
Firms cited on this prompt:
P-013
Validation
P-014
Follow Up
P-015
Follow Up
Firms cited on this prompt:
81 winning prompts Prompts where AI cited this firm
W-001
Decision
Also cited on this prompt:
W-002
Decision
Also cited on this prompt:
W-003
Decision
Also cited on this prompt:
W-004
Situation
Also cited on this prompt:
W-005
Situation
W-006
Validation
Also cited on this prompt:
W-007
Validation
Also cited on this prompt:
W-008
Validation
Also cited on this prompt:
W-009
Validation
Also cited on this prompt:
W-010
Validation
Also cited on this prompt:
Peer firms in New York City personal injury
Other firms ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Perplexity name in this category.
#1
Block O'Toole & Murphy
40.1% response mention rate · 4/4 AI
#3
The Perecman Firm, P.L.L.C.
14.2% response mention rate · 4/4 AI
#4
Matulewicz v Sullivan Papain Block McGrath Coffinas & Cannavo, P.C.
12.4% response mention rate · 4/4 AI
#5
Cellino Law Injury Attorneys
12.3% response mention rate · 4/4 AI
#6
Rheingold Giuffra Ruffo Plotkin & Hellman LLP
11.2% response mention rate · 4/4 AI
#7
Weitz & Luxenberg
10.2% response mention rate · 4/4 AI
#8
Lipsig, Shapey, Manus & Moverman, P.C.
10.0% response mention rate · 3/4 AI
#9
Parker Waichman LLP - Personal Injury Accident Attorneys
8.9% response mention rate · 3/4 AI
Field notes on reading these rankings
All notes →AI SEO for Personal Injury Lawyers: Why the Market Is Still Open
AI SEO for personal injury lawyers looks different from AI SEO in other legal verticals because the market is still fragmented. In our NYC audit, the top PI fir...
Why Your Law Firm Can Rank in Google and Still Be Invisible to ChatGPT
Google rankings reward pages built for keywords. AI recommendations reward pages that answer a buyer situation clearly enough to be reused in an answer.
How to Read AI Search Rankings (Beyond Vanity Metrics)
AI search rankings measure how often assistants like ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Perplexity name a business when a buyer asks who to hire. Read for share of vo...
Want to climb the rankings?
Compare the sources and page content associated with citations in this category.
Get a full audit →