New York City · Legal
Personal Injury
How to read the rankings
How to read the rankings
Columns
- Rank
- Position in the ranking within the latest snapshot.
- Mentions
- Latest-snapshot AI responses that named this business.
- Response mention rate (±margin)
- Mentions ÷ latest-snapshot AI responses. The ± is the 95% confidence margin.
- Per-AI columns
- Responses from each assistant that named the business; together they sum to Mentions.
The independent record of which businesses ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Perplexity put on the shortlist when New York City buyers describe what they need.
Model versions and response counts
openai/gpt-4o: 208 · perplexity/sonar: 206 · google/gemini-2.5-flash: 206 · anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.6: 208
Viclaro Atlas
A Viclaro publication · viclaro.app
All-time Personal Injury results
AI responses analyzed
8,430
of 96,898 across Atlas · 8.7%
Business mentions
23,062
of 403,245 across Atlas · 5.7%
Businesses named over time
1,574
of 34,867 across Atlas · 4.5%
Buyer questions tested
155
of 1,616 across Atlas · 9.6%
Published snapshots
19
of 177 across Atlas · 11%
Businesses ranked
670
in the latest snapshot
These totals cover all published Personal Injury research. The current ranking uses 828 eligible AI responses from Sep 15, 2026.
Filters this ranking only. Use Atlas search above to search every market.
| #Rank | Business | HitsMentions | RateResponse mention rate | Clauden=208 | ChatGPTn=208 | Geminin=206 | Perplexityn=206 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1 |
Block O'Toole & Murphy
Claude 60
ChatGPT 101
Gemini 127
Perplexity 49
|
337 | 40.7% ±3.3 | 60 | 101 | 127 | 49 |
| #2 |
Gair, Gair, Conason, Rubinowitz, Bloom, Hershenhorn, Steigman & Mackauf
Claude 127
ChatGPT 33
Gemini 96
Perplexity 69
|
325 | 39.3% ±3.3 | 127 | 33 | 96 | 69 |
| #3 |
Cellino Law Injury Attorneys
Claude 75
ChatGPT 13
Gemini 13
Perplexity 9
|
110 | 13.3% ±2.3 | 75 | 13 | 13 | 9 |
| #4 |
The Perecman Firm, P.L.L.C.
Claude 15
ChatGPT 53
Gemini 12
Perplexity 25
|
105 | 12.7% ±2.3 | 15 | 53 | 12 | 25 |
| #5 |
|
102 | 12.3% ±2.2 | 18 | 15 | 60 | 9 |
| #6 |
Rheingold Giuffra Ruffo Plotkin & Hellman LLP
Claude 53
ChatGPT 22
Gemini 7
Perplexity 7
|
89 | 10.7% ±2.1 | 53 | 22 | 7 | 7 |
| #7 |
Parker Waichman LLP
Claude 1
ChatGPT 73
Gemini 1
Perplexity 12
|
87 | 10.5% ±2.1 | 1 | 73 | 1 | 12 |
| #8 |
|
78 | 9.4% ±2.0 | 10 | 2 | 65 | 1 |
| #9 |
|
77 | 9.3% ±2.0 | 0 | 66 | 6 | 5 |
| #10 |
KDLM
Claude 30
ChatGPT 20
Gemini 1
Perplexity 9
|
60 | 7.2% ±1.8 | 30 | 20 | 1 | 9 |
| #11 |
|
60 | 7.2% ±1.8 | 10 | 35 | 14 | 1 |
| #12 |
Wingate, Russotti, Shapiro, Moses & Halperin, LLP
Unverified
Claude 25
ChatGPT 0
Gemini 23
Perplexity 10
|
58 | 7.0% ±1.7 | 25 | 0 | 23 | 10 |
| #13 |
The Law Offices of Michael S. Lamonsoff, PLLC
Claude 1
ChatGPT 13
Gemini 27
Perplexity 10
|
51 | 6.2% ±1.6 | 1 | 13 | 27 | 10 |
| #14 |
Hach & Rose, LLP
Claude 29
ChatGPT 13
Gemini 0
Perplexity 8
|
50 | 6.0% ±1.6 | 29 | 13 | 0 | 8 |
| #15 |
|
44 | 5.3% ±1.5 | 20 | 9 | 12 | 3 |
| #16 |
|
42 | 5.1% ±1.5 | 31 | 9 | 2 | 0 |
| #17 |
|
42 | 5.1% ±1.5 | 20 | 5 | 17 | 0 |
| #18 |
Raphaelson & Levine Law Firm, P.C.
Claude 1
ChatGPT 6
Gemini 3
Perplexity 25
|
35 | 4.2% ±1.4 | 1 | 6 | 3 | 25 |
| #19 |
|
33 | 4.0% ±1.3 | 1 | 4 | 15 | 13 |
| #20 |
|
33 | 4.0% ±1.3 | 10 | 8 | 10 | 5 |
| #21 |
Pegalis Law Group, LLC
Claude 5
ChatGPT 6
Gemini 19
Perplexity 0
|
30 | 3.6% ±1.3 | 5 | 6 | 19 | 0 |
| #22 |
|
23 | 2.8% ±1.1 | 8 | 4 | 9 | 2 |
| #23 |
|
23 | 2.8% ±1.1 | 15 | 0 | 2 | 6 |
| #24 |
|
23 | 2.8% ±1.1 | 19 | 0 | 4 | 0 |
| #25 |
Cosentino v Sullivan Papain Block McGrath & Cannavo, P.C.
Unverified
Claude 10
ChatGPT 3
Gemini 7
Perplexity 2
|
22 | 2.7% ±1.1 | 10 | 3 | 7 | 2 |
Ranks #26–#100 (75 more businesses) click to expand
| #26 | 21 mentions · 2.5% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #27 | 20 mentions · 2.4% · 3/4 AIs | |
| #28 | 20 mentions · 2.4% · 2/4 AIs | |
| #29 | 18 mentions · 2.2% · 3/4 AIs | |
| #30 | 16 mentions · 1.9% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #31 | 16 mentions · 1.9% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #32 | 16 mentions · 1.9% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #33 | 16 mentions · 1.9% · 2/4 AIs | |
| #34 | 16 mentions · 1.9% · 2/4 AIs | |
| #35 | 15 mentions · 1.8% · 3/4 AIs | |
| #36 | 14 mentions · 1.7% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #37 | 14 mentions · 1.7% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #38 | 14 mentions · 1.7% · 3/4 AIs | |
| #39 |
Sullivan Papain Block McManus Coffinas & Cannavo P.C.
www.triallaw1.com
14 mentions · 1.7% · 2/4 AIs
|
14 mentions · 1.7% · 2/4 AIs |
| #40 | 13 mentions · 1.6% · 3/4 AIs | |
| #41 | 13 mentions · 1.6% · 3/4 AIs | |
| #42 | 13 mentions · 1.6% · 2/4 AIs | |
| #43 | 12 mentions · 1.5% · 3/4 AIs | |
| #44 | 12 mentions · 1.5% · 3/4 AIs | |
| #45 | 12 mentions · 1.5% · 1/4 AIs | |
| #46 | 11 mentions · 1.3% · 2/4 AIs | |
| #47 | 11 mentions · 1.3% · 1/4 AIs | |
| #48 | 10 mentions · 1.2% · 3/4 AIs | |
| #49 | 9 mentions · 1.1% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #50 | 9 mentions · 1.1% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #51 | 9 mentions · 1.1% · 2/4 AIs | |
| #52 | 9 mentions · 1.1% · 2/4 AIs | |
| #53 | 9 mentions · 1.1% · 1/4 AIs | |
| #54 | 9 mentions · 1.1% · 1/4 AIs | |
| #55 | 8 mentions · 1.0% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #56 | 8 mentions · 1.0% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #57 | 8 mentions · 1.0% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #58 | 8 mentions · 1.0% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #59 | 8 mentions · 1.0% · 3/4 AIs | |
| #60 | 8 mentions · 1.0% · 3/4 AIs | |
| #61 | 8 mentions · 1.0% · 3/4 AIs | |
| #62 | 8 mentions · 1.0% · 1/4 AIs | |
| #63 | 7 mentions · 0.9% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #64 | 7 mentions · 0.9% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #65 | 7 mentions · 0.9% · 3/4 AIs | |
| #66 | 7 mentions · 0.9% · 3/4 AIs | |
| #67 | 7 mentions · 0.9% · 2/4 AIs | |
| #68 | 7 mentions · 0.9% · 2/4 AIs | |
| #69 | 7 mentions · 0.9% · 1/4 AIs | |
| #70 | 7 mentions · 0.9% · 1/4 AIs | |
| #71 | 7 mentions · 0.9% · 1/4 AIs | |
| #72 | 7 mentions · 0.9% · 1/4 AIs | |
| #73 | 6 mentions · 0.7% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #74 | 6 mentions · 0.7% · 3/4 AIs | |
| #75 | 6 mentions · 0.7% · 3/4 AIs | |
| #76 | 6 mentions · 0.7% · 3/4 AIs | |
| #77 | 6 mentions · 0.7% · 3/4 AIs | |
| #78 | 6 mentions · 0.7% · 3/4 AIs | |
| #79 | 6 mentions · 0.7% · 3/4 AIs | |
| #80 | 6 mentions · 0.7% · 3/4 AIs | |
| #81 | 6 mentions · 0.7% · 3/4 AIs | |
| #82 | 6 mentions · 0.7% · 2/4 AIs | |
| #83 | 6 mentions · 0.7% · 2/4 AIs | |
| #84 | 6 mentions · 0.7% · 2/4 AIs | |
| #85 | 6 mentions · 0.7% · 2/4 AIs | |
| #86 | 6 mentions · 0.7% · 1/4 AIs | |
| #87 | 6 mentions · 0.7% · 1/4 AIs | |
| #88 | 5 mentions · 0.6% · 3/4 AIs | |
| #89 | 5 mentions · 0.6% · 2/4 AIs | |
| #90 | 5 mentions · 0.6% · 2/4 AIs | |
| #91 | 5 mentions · 0.6% · 2/4 AIs | |
| #92 | 5 mentions · 0.6% · 2/4 AIs | |
| #93 | 5 mentions · 0.6% · 2/4 AIs | |
| #94 | 5 mentions · 0.6% · 2/4 AIs | |
| #95 | 5 mentions · 0.6% · 2/4 AIs | |
| #96 | 5 mentions · 0.6% · 2/4 AIs | |
| #97 | 5 mentions · 0.6% · 1/4 AIs | |
| #98 | 5 mentions · 0.6% · 1/4 AIs | |
| #99 | 5 mentions · 0.6% · 1/4 AIs | |
| #100 | 5 mentions · 0.6% · 1/4 AIs |
570 additional firms beyond rank 100 available via the JSON API (requires atlas API token).
No firms in this ranking match that search.
Request a scan
Don't see your firm above?
Most firms are tracked below the top 25 shown here — try the search bar at the top of the page first (Cmd+K). If your firm hasn't been scanned yet, tell us who you are and we'll add it. Result lands in your inbox, no account required.
Thanks — we've got your request.
We'll scan the assistants for your business and email the results to the address you gave. Usually within a week; sometimes faster if we're already scanning your vertical.
Sources cited by AI
Directories, associations, and other sources
These sources appeared in AI answers as places to research, verify, or compare businesses. We show them here because they helped shape the answers.
1. Matulewicz v Sullivan Papain Block McGrath Coffinas & Cannavo, P.C.
93 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
2. New York State Unified Court System
courts.state.ny.us
15 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
3. Martindale
13 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
4. Super Lawyers
13 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
5. Avvo
11 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
6. Federal Court PACER System
pacer.uscourts.gov
8 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
7. New York State Bar Association
nysba.org
7 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
8. American Association for Justice
3 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
9. New York State Trial Lawyers Association
3 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
10. NYC Bar Association
3 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
11. New York State Office of Court Administration (OCA)
3 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
12. Best Lawyers in America
bestlawyers.com
2 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
13. Arkansas Department of Health and Human Services v. Ahlborn
2 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
14. First Department Attorney Grievance Committee
2 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
15. New York State Department of Health
2 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
16. Third Judicial Department
1 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
17. National Board of Trial Advocacy
1 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
18. Reddit
1 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
19. Justia
1 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
20. Asian American Bar Association of New York
1 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
21. Supreme Court
1 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
22. Yelp
1 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
23. MTA Law Department
1 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
24. New York Court of Appeals
new york court of appeals
1 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
These sources can reveal where buyers and AI assistants research the market. Source mentions are reported separately from business rankings.
Sample buyer responses
editorial · not counted in rankingsVerbatim responses from prompts that ask for advice rather than firm recommendations. Excluded from ranking calculations.
"We just found out our 9-month-old was dropped at her daycare in New York City. They didn't tell us — we noticed swelling on her head when we picked her up. ER is doing a CT scan no..."
Consider contacting these personal injury attorneys in New York City: 1. **Rosenbaum & Rosenbaum, P.C.** - Known for handling daycare negligence cases. 2. **Parker Waichman LLP** - Offers a strong track record in personal injury claims. 3. **Block O'Toole & Murphy** - Specializes in serious injury cases. 4. **The Perecman Firm, P.L.L.C.** - Experienced in child injury and daycare negligence. 5. **Gair, Gair, Conason, Rubinowitz, Bloom, Hershenhorn, Steigman & Mackauf** - Ren...
"My PI lawyer in New York City is telling me to settle for $400K. He says trial could get me $1M+ but takes 2-3 more years and I might lose. I'm exhausted. What would you do?"
Deciding whether to settle or go to trial depends on your personal circumstances, risk tolerance, and financial needs. Consider the following: 1. **Evaluate Your Needs**: Assess if the immediate settlement meets your financial needs and provides closure. 2. **Risk Assessment**: Consider the risk of losing at trial versus the potential higher reward. 3. **Time Factor**: Weigh the emotional and financial cost of a prolonged trial against the certainty of a settlement. 4. **Sec...
"I got hurt at work in New York City. My boss says I have to use workers comp. My uncle says I should sue. Are those mutually exclusive or can you do both? What's the difference, ac..."
Workers' compensation and a personal injury lawsuit are generally mutually exclusive in New York. Workers' compensation is a no-fault insurance system that provides benefits for medical expenses and lost wages without needing to prove employer negligence. You usually cannot sue your employer directly for a workplace injury if you accept workers' comp benefits. However, you might be able to sue a third party if they contributed to your injury. Consult with a personal injury...
In-depth report
How AI recommends Personal Injury in New York City
A written breakdown of the current snapshot — which firms each assistant names, how concentrated the recommendations are, and what a buyer would actually see if they asked ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini or Perplexity today.
Further reading
Pillar guide
AI Search Rankings: A 2026 Guide
How AI search rankings work and how to read a response-mention-rate leaderboard.
Playbook
How to Rank in ChatGPT
The exact structure and language that makes an AI reuse your firm as an answer.
Concepts
Generative Engine Optimization (GEO)
GEO vs AEO vs SEO — definitions, metrics, and limitations.
Field notes on reading these rankings
All notes →AI SEO for Personal Injury Lawyers: Why the Market Is Still Open
AI SEO for personal injury lawyers looks different from AI SEO in other legal verticals because the market is still fragmented. In our NYC audit, the top PI fir...
Why Your Law Firm Can Rank in Google and Still Be Invisible to ChatGPT
Google rankings reward pages built for keywords. AI recommendations reward pages that answer a buyer situation clearly enough to be reused in an answer.
How to Read AI Search Rankings (Beyond Vanity Metrics)
AI search rankings measure how often assistants like ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Perplexity name a business when a buyer asks who to hire. Read for share of vo...
Don't see your business? Or ranked low?
See which prompts and assistants omit your business, then measure the effect of site changes.
Get a free AI visibility audit →Methodology v3.1 · latest snapshot: 828 AI responses and 3,477 business mentions · all-time corpus: 8,430 responses and 23,062 business mentions · Sep 15, 2026. 95% confidence intervals. Full methodology: viclaro.app/leaderboards/methodology.