New York City · Legal
Personal Injury
How to read the rankings
How to read the rankings
Columns
- Rank
- Position in the ranking within the latest snapshot.
- Mentions
- Latest-snapshot AI responses that named this business.
- Mention share
- Business mentions ÷ all business mentions in the latest snapshot.
- Response mention rate (±margin)
- Mentions ÷ latest-snapshot AI responses. The ± is the 95% confidence margin.
- Per-AI columns
- Responses from each assistant that named the business; together they sum to Mentions.
Who AI recommends when New York City buyers ask ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Perplexity for personal injury.
Exact model variants and retained response counts
openai/gpt-4o: 208 · perplexity/sonar: 208 · google/gemini-2.5-flash: 208 · anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.6: 208
Viclaro Atlas
A Viclaro publication · viclaro.app
Personal Injury corpus
AI responses analyzed
2,230
of 23,454 across Atlas · 9.5%
Business mentions extracted
6,820
of 75,886 across Atlas · 9.0%
Businesses observed
1,148
of 12,266 across Atlas · 9.4%
Buyer prompts tested
155
of 1,616 across Atlas · 9.6%
Snapshots retained
30
of 174 across Atlas · 17%
Businesses ranked now
726
in the latest snapshot
The five totals count every retained Personal Injury scan response and extraction since inception; snapshot rebuilds do not duplicate them. The ranking and its mention rates use 832 eligible responses from the latest snapshot (Aug 24, 2026).
Filters this ranking only. Use Atlas search above to search every market.
| Rank | Business | Mentions | Mention share | Response mention rate | Clauden=208 | ChatGPTn=208 | Geminin=208 | Perplexityn=208 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1 | 334 | 8.7% | 40.1% ±3.3 | 62 | 96 | 127 | 49 | |
| #2 | 329 | 8.5% | 39.5% ±3.3 | 128 | 24 | 115 | 62 | |
| #3 | 118 | 3.1% | 14.2% ±2.4 | 19 | 68 | 6 | 25 | |
| #4 | 103 | 2.7% | 12.4% ±2.2 | 47 | 47 | 4 | 5 | |
| #5 | 102 | 2.7% | 12.3% ±2.2 | 69 | 12 | 12 | 9 | |
| #6 | 93 | 2.4% | 11.2% ±2.1 | 48 | 30 | 7 | 8 | |
| #7 | 85 | 2.2% | 10.2% ±2.1 | 15 | 15 | 51 | 4 | |
| #8 | 83 | 2.2% | 10.0% ±2.0 | 9 | 2 | 72 | 0 | |
| #9 | 74 | 1.9% | 8.9% ±1.9 | 2 | 66 | 0 | 6 | |
| #10 | 72 | 1.9% | 8.7% ±1.9 | 33 | 27 | 0 | 12 | |
| #11 | 64 | 1.7% | 7.7% ±1.8 | 0 | 51 | 7 | 6 | |
| #12 | 61 | 1.6% | 7.3% ±1.8 | 2 | 12 | 39 | 8 | |
| #13 | 54 | 1.4% | 6.5% ±1.7 | 24 | 0 | 20 | 10 | |
| #14 | 53 | 1.4% | 6.4% ±1.7 | 9 | 34 | 8 | 2 | |
| #15 | 49 | 1.3% | 5.9% ±1.6 | 8 | 8 | 29 | 4 | |
| #16 | 46 | 1.2% | 5.5% ±1.6 | 31 | 11 | 0 | 4 | |
| #17 | 42 | 1.1% | 5.1% ±1.5 | 19 | 10 | 11 | 2 | |
| #18 | 36 | 0.9% | 4.3% ±1.4 | 10 | 11 | 10 | 5 | |
| #19 | 34 | 0.9% | 4.1% ±1.4 | 2 | 6 | 1 | 25 | |
| #20 | 33 | 0.9% | 4.0% ±1.3 | 0 | 4 | 11 | 18 | |
| #21 | 29 | 0.8% | 3.5% ±1.3 | 5 | 16 | 2 | 6 | |
| #22 | 29 | 0.8% | 3.5% ±1.3 | 19 | 8 | 2 | 0 | |
| #23 | 27 | 0.7% | 3.3% ±1.2 | 21 | 2 | 1 | 3 | |
| #24 | 27 | 0.7% | 3.3% ±1.2 | 3 | 6 | 18 | 0 | |
| #25 | 24 | 0.6% | 2.9% ±1.2 | 7 | 14 | 1 | 2 |
Ranks #26–#100 (75 more firms) click to expand
| #26 | 24 mentions · 0.6% mention share · 4/4 AIs | |
| #27 | 24 mentions · 0.6% mention share · 4/4 AIs | |
| #28 | 24 mentions · 0.6% mention share · 3/4 AIs | |
| #29 | 23 mentions · 0.6% mention share · 3/4 AIs | |
| #30 | 23 mentions · 0.6% mention share · 2/4 AIs | |
| #31 | 22 mentions · 0.6% mention share · 4/4 AIs | |
| #32 | 22 mentions · 0.6% mention share · 3/4 AIs | |
| #33 | 21 mentions · 0.5% mention share · 4/4 AIs | |
| #34 | 20 mentions · 0.5% mention share · 4/4 AIs | |
| #35 | 18 mentions · 0.5% mention share · 1/4 AIs | |
| #36 | 17 mentions · 0.4% mention share · 1/4 AIs | |
| #37 | 16 mentions · 0.4% mention share · 4/4 AIs | |
| #38 | 16 mentions · 0.4% mention share · 3/4 AIs | |
| #39 | 15 mentions · 0.4% mention share · 2/4 AIs | |
| #40 | 14 mentions · 0.4% mention share · 3/4 AIs | |
| #41 | 14 mentions · 0.4% mention share · 2/4 AIs | |
| #42 | 14 mentions · 0.4% mention share · 2/4 AIs | |
| #43 | 13 mentions · 0.3% mention share · 4/4 AIs | |
| #44 | 13 mentions · 0.3% mention share · 1/4 AIs | |
| #45 | 12 mentions · 0.3% mention share · 4/4 AIs | |
| #46 | 12 mentions · 0.3% mention share · 4/4 AIs | |
| #47 | 12 mentions · 0.3% mention share · 3/4 AIs | |
| #48 | 11 mentions · 0.3% mention share · 3/4 AIs | |
| #49 | 11 mentions · 0.3% mention share · 3/4 AIs | |
| #50 | 11 mentions · 0.3% mention share · 3/4 AIs | |
| #51 | 11 mentions · 0.3% mention share · 1/4 AIs | |
| #52 | 10 mentions · 0.3% mention share · 3/4 AIs | |
| #53 | 10 mentions · 0.3% mention share · 3/4 AIs | |
| #54 | 10 mentions · 0.3% mention share · 2/4 AIs | |
| #55 | 10 mentions · 0.3% mention share · 1/4 AIs | |
| #56 | 9 mentions · 0.2% mention share · 4/4 AIs | |
| #57 | 9 mentions · 0.2% mention share · 4/4 AIs | |
| #58 | 9 mentions · 0.2% mention share · 3/4 AIs | |
| #59 | 9 mentions · 0.2% mention share · 3/4 AIs | |
| #60 | 9 mentions · 0.2% mention share · 3/4 AIs | |
| #61 | 9 mentions · 0.2% mention share · 1/4 AIs | |
| #62 | 8 mentions · 0.2% mention share · 4/4 AIs | |
| #63 | 8 mentions · 0.2% mention share · 4/4 AIs | |
| #64 | 8 mentions · 0.2% mention share · 3/4 AIs | |
| #65 | 8 mentions · 0.2% mention share · 2/4 AIs | |
| #66 | 8 mentions · 0.2% mention share · 2/4 AIs | |
| #67 | 8 mentions · 0.2% mention share · 2/4 AIs | |
| #68 | 8 mentions · 0.2% mention share · 2/4 AIs | |
| #69 | 8 mentions · 0.2% mention share · 2/4 AIs | |
| #70 | 8 mentions · 0.2% mention share · 1/4 AIs | |
| #71 | 8 mentions · 0.2% mention share · 1/4 AIs | |
| #72 | 7 mentions · 0.2% mention share · 4/4 AIs | |
| #73 | 7 mentions · 0.2% mention share · 4/4 AIs | |
| #74 | 7 mentions · 0.2% mention share · 3/4 AIs | |
| #75 | 7 mentions · 0.2% mention share · 3/4 AIs | |
| #76 | 7 mentions · 0.2% mention share · 3/4 AIs | |
| #77 | 7 mentions · 0.2% mention share · 3/4 AIs | |
| #78 | 7 mentions · 0.2% mention share · 2/4 AIs | |
| #79 | 7 mentions · 0.2% mention share · 2/4 AIs | |
| #80 | 7 mentions · 0.2% mention share · 2/4 AIs | |
| #81 | 7 mentions · 0.2% mention share · 2/4 AIs | |
| #82 | 7 mentions · 0.2% mention share · 1/4 AIs | |
| #83 | 7 mentions · 0.2% mention share · 1/4 AIs | |
| #84 | 7 mentions · 0.2% mention share · 1/4 AIs | |
| #85 | 7 mentions · 0.2% mention share · 1/4 AIs | |
| #86 | 7 mentions · 0.2% mention share · 1/4 AIs | |
| #87 | 7 mentions · 0.2% mention share · 1/4 AIs | |
| #88 | 6 mentions · 0.2% mention share · 4/4 AIs | |
| #89 | 6 mentions · 0.2% mention share · 4/4 AIs | |
| #90 | 6 mentions · 0.2% mention share · 3/4 AIs | |
| #91 | 6 mentions · 0.2% mention share · 3/4 AIs | |
| #92 | 6 mentions · 0.2% mention share · 3/4 AIs | |
| #93 | 6 mentions · 0.2% mention share · 3/4 AIs | |
| #94 | 6 mentions · 0.2% mention share · 3/4 AIs | |
| #95 | 6 mentions · 0.2% mention share · 3/4 AIs | |
| #96 | 6 mentions · 0.2% mention share · 3/4 AIs | |
| #97 | 6 mentions · 0.2% mention share · 3/4 AIs | |
| #98 | 6 mentions · 0.2% mention share · 3/4 AIs | |
| #99 | 6 mentions · 0.2% mention share · 3/4 AIs | |
| #100 | 6 mentions · 0.2% mention share · 2/4 AIs |
626 additional firms beyond rank 100 available via the JSON API (requires atlas API token).
No firms in this ranking match that search.
Sample buyer responses
editorial · not counted in rankingsVerbatim responses from prompts that ask for advice rather than firm recommendations. Excluded from ranking calculations.
"I need a PI lawyer based in the Bronx specifically — not someone with a 'Bronx office' that's really just a one-room rental. I was hit by a livery cab on Fordham Road and I want so..."
1. **The Law Offices of Ivan M. Diamond** - Known for personal injury cases and a strong presence in the Bronx. 2. **The Law Offices of Joseph A. Romano, P.C.** - Specializes in personal injury and workers' compensation, with deep ties to the Bronx community. 3. **The Law Offices of Michael S. Lamonsoff, PLLC** - Offers extensive experience in handling personal injury cases in the Bronx. 4. **Parker Waichman LLP** - Recognized for their work in personal injury law and familia...
"Mwen bezwen yon avoka pou aksidan nan New York City ki pale Kreyòl Ayisyen. Mwen te gen yon aksidan machin nan Brooklyn. M pa byen pale anglè. Kiyès ki kapab ede?"
Mwen regrèt pou aksidan ou te gen la. Gen kèk avoka nan New York City ki pale Kreyòl Ayisyen epi ki espesyalize nan zafè aksidan. Men kèk etap ou ka suiv pou jwenn yon avoka ki ka ede w: 1. **Rechèch sou entènèt**: Ou ka fè rechèch sou entènèt pou avoka aksidan nan New York City ki pale Kreyòl Ayisyen. Ou ka itilize fraz tankou "avoka aksidan Kreyòl Ayisyen New York City" nan motè rechèch Google. 2. **Rezo sosyal**: Gade si gen gwoup Facebook oswa lòt rezo sosyal ki gen Ayi...
"If this were your brother — 34, construction worker in New York City, fell two stories off scaffolding, fractured spine, the contractor's insurance is offering $75K — would you tel..."
I would recommend fighting the offer. Given the severity of the injury and potential long-term implications, $75K seems insufficient. He should consult with a personal injury attorney to pursue a more appropriate settlement. Here are some firms and attorneys known for handling such cases in New York City: 1. **Sullivan Papain Block McGrath Coffinas & Cannavo P.C.** - Known for large settlements in construction accidents. 2. **Block O'Toole & Murphy, LLP** - Renowned for thei...
In-depth report
How AI recommends Personal Injury in New York City
A written breakdown of the current snapshot — which firms each assistant names, how concentrated the recommendations are, and what a buyer would actually see if they asked ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini or Perplexity today.
Further reading
Pillar guide
AI Search Rankings: A 2026 Guide
How AI search rankings work and how to read a response-mention-rate leaderboard.
Playbook
How to Rank in ChatGPT
The exact structure and language that makes an AI reuse your firm as an answer.
Concepts
Generative Engine Optimization (GEO)
GEO vs AEO vs SEO — definitions, metrics, and limitations.
Field notes on reading these rankings
All notes →AI SEO for Personal Injury Lawyers: Why the Market Is Still Open
AI SEO for personal injury lawyers looks different from AI SEO in other legal verticals because the market is still fragmented. In our NYC audit, the top PI fir...
Why Your Law Firm Can Rank in Google and Still Be Invisible to ChatGPT
Google rankings reward pages built for keywords. AI recommendations reward pages that answer a buyer situation clearly enough to be reused in an answer.
How to Read AI Search Rankings (Beyond Vanity Metrics)
AI search rankings measure how often assistants like ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Perplexity name a business when a buyer asks who to hire. Read for share of vo...
Don't see your business? Or ranked low?
See which prompts and assistants omit your business, then measure the effect of site changes.
Get a free AI visibility audit →Methodology v3.1 · latest snapshot: 832 AI responses and 3,849 business mentions · all-time corpus: 2,230 responses and 6,820 business mentions · Aug 24, 2026. 95% confidence intervals. Full methodology: viclaro.app/leaderboards/methodology.