New York City · Legal
Personal Injury
How to read the rankings
How to read the rankings
Columns
- Rank
- Position across all eligible AI responses for this market.
- Mentions
- AI responses that named this business.
- Response mention rate (±margin)
- Mentions divided by eligible responses. The ± is the 95% confidence margin.
- Per-AI columns
- Responses from each assistant that named the business; together they sum to Mentions.
The independent record of which businesses ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Perplexity put on the shortlist when New York City buyers describe what they need.
Model versions and response counts
openai/gpt-4o: 208 · perplexity/sonar: 206 · google/gemini-2.5-flash: 206 · anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.6: 208
Viclaro Atlas
A Viclaro publication · viclaro.app
All-time Personal Injury results
AI responses analyzed
8,430
of 96,898 across Atlas · 8.7%
Business mentions
23,062
of 403,245 across Atlas · 5.7%
Businesses named over time
1,574
of 34,867 across Atlas · 4.5%
Buyer questions tested
155
of 1,616 across Atlas · 9.6%
Published snapshots
19
of 177 across Atlas · 11%
Businesses ranked
1,420
across all eligible responses
These totals cover all published Personal Injury research. The all-time ranking uses 5,574 eligible AI responses collected since Jun 26, 2026.
Filters this ranking only. Use Atlas search above to search every market.
| #Rank | Business | HitsMentions | RateResponse mention rate | Claude | ChatGPT | Gemini | Perplexity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1 |
Block O'Toole & Murphy
Claude 270
ChatGPT 430
Gemini 511
Perplexity 202
|
1,413 | 25.3% ±1.1 | 270 | 430 | 511 | 202 |
| #2 |
Gair, Gair, Conason, Rubinowitz, Bloom, Hershenhorn, Steigman & Mackauf
Claude 557
ChatGPT 134
Gemini 420
Perplexity 265
|
1,376 | 24.7% ±1.1 | 557 | 134 | 420 | 265 |
| #3 |
The Perecman Firm, P.L.L.C.
Claude 77
ChatGPT 251
Gemini 41
Perplexity 102
|
471 | 8.4% ±0.7 | 77 | 251 | 41 | 102 |
| #4 |
Cellino Law Injury Attorneys
Claude 305
ChatGPT 60
Gemini 56
Perplexity 45
|
466 | 8.4% ±0.7 | 305 | 60 | 56 | 45 |
| #5 |
Rheingold Giuffra Ruffo Plotkin & Hellman LLP
Claude 229
ChatGPT 128
Gemini 32
Perplexity 39
|
428 | 7.7% ±0.7 | 229 | 128 | 32 | 39 |
| #6 |
|
427 | 7.7% ±0.7 | 78 | 74 | 249 | 26 |
| #7 |
|
400 | 7.2% ±0.7 | 65 | 66 | 247 | 22 |
| #8 |
Parker Waichman LLP
Claude 3
ChatGPT 293
Gemini 2
Perplexity 34
|
332 | 6.0% ±0.6 | 3 | 293 | 2 | 34 |
| #9 |
|
318 | 5.7% ±0.6 | 39 | 7 | 270 | 2 |
| #10 |
|
302 | 5.4% ±0.6 | 1 | 260 | 18 | 23 |
| #11 |
Wingate, Russotti, Shapiro, Moses & Halperin, LLP
Unverified
Claude 114
ChatGPT 0
Gemini 128
Perplexity 55
|
297 | 5.3% ±0.6 | 114 | 0 | 128 | 55 |
| #12 |
KDLM
Claude 144
ChatGPT 103
Gemini 2
Perplexity 42
|
291 | 5.2% ±0.6 | 144 | 103 | 2 | 42 |
| #13 |
|
251 | 4.5% ±0.5 | 41 | 152 | 50 | 8 |
| #14 |
|
231 | 4.1% ±0.5 | 37 | 140 | 48 | 6 |
| #15 |
The Law Offices of Michael S. Lamonsoff, PLLC
Claude 8
ChatGPT 61
Gemini 117
Perplexity 30
|
216 | 3.9% ±0.5 | 8 | 61 | 117 | 30 |
| #16 |
Hach & Rose, LLP
Claude 131
ChatGPT 48
Gemini 0
Perplexity 26
|
205 | 3.7% ±0.5 | 131 | 48 | 0 | 26 |
| #17 |
|
192 | 3.4% ±0.5 | 91 | 43 | 43 | 15 |
| #18 |
|
168 | 3.0% ±0.4 | 121 | 39 | 7 | 1 |
| #19 |
|
163 | 2.9% ±0.4 | 50 | 44 | 43 | 26 |
| #20 |
|
153 | 2.7% ±0.4 | 69 | 35 | 46 | 3 |
| #21 |
Raphaelson & Levine Law Firm, P.C.
Claude 7
ChatGPT 27
Gemini 8
Perplexity 100
|
142 | 2.5% ±0.4 | 7 | 27 | 8 | 100 |
| #22 |
Sullivan Papain Block McManus Coffinas & Cannavo P.C.
Claude 59
ChatGPT 20
Gemini 5
Perplexity 57
|
141 | 2.5% ±0.4 | 59 | 20 | 5 | 57 |
| #23 |
|
131 | 2.4% ±0.4 | 1 | 17 | 43 | 70 |
| #24 |
Pegalis Law Group, LLC
Claude 24
ChatGPT 30
Gemini 72
Perplexity 0
|
126 | 2.3% ±0.4 | 24 | 30 | 72 | 0 |
| #25 |
|
124 | 2.2% ±0.4 | 1 | 13 | 43 | 67 |
Ranks #26–#100 (75 more businesses) click to expand
| #26 | 113 mentions · 2.0% · 3/4 AIs | |
| #27 | 111 mentions · 2.0% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #28 | 103 mentions · 1.8% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #29 | 98 mentions · 1.8% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #30 | 97 mentions · 1.7% · 3/4 AIs | |
| #31 | 97 mentions · 1.7% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #32 | 95 mentions · 1.7% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #33 | 92 mentions · 1.7% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #34 | 82 mentions · 1.5% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #35 | 80 mentions · 1.4% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #36 | 68 mentions · 1.2% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #37 | 67 mentions · 1.2% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #38 | 65 mentions · 1.2% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #39 | 65 mentions · 1.2% · 3/4 AIs | |
| #40 | 63 mentions · 1.1% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #41 | 62 mentions · 1.1% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #42 | 62 mentions · 1.1% · 2/4 AIs | |
| #43 | 60 mentions · 1.1% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #44 | 53 mentions · 1.0% · 2/4 AIs | |
| #45 | 49 mentions · 0.9% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #46 | 49 mentions · 0.9% · 2/4 AIs | |
| #47 | 47 mentions · 0.8% · 1/4 AIs | |
| #48 | 44 mentions · 0.8% · 3/4 AIs | |
| #49 | 44 mentions · 0.8% · 3/4 AIs | |
| #50 | 41 mentions · 0.7% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #51 | 38 mentions · 0.7% · 1/4 AIs | |
| #52 | 37 mentions · 0.7% · 3/4 AIs | |
| #53 | 36 mentions · 0.6% · 3/4 AIs | |
| #54 | 36 mentions · 0.6% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #55 | 36 mentions · 0.6% · 3/4 AIs | |
| #56 | 36 mentions · 0.6% · 1/4 AIs | |
| #57 | 34 mentions · 0.6% · 3/4 AIs | |
| #58 | 34 mentions · 0.6% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #59 | 33 mentions · 0.6% · 3/4 AIs | |
| #60 | 33 mentions · 0.6% · 1/4 AIs | |
| #61 | 31 mentions · 0.6% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #62 | 31 mentions · 0.6% · 3/4 AIs | |
| #63 | 31 mentions · 0.6% · 3/4 AIs | |
| #64 | 31 mentions · 0.6% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #65 | 30 mentions · 0.5% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #66 | 30 mentions · 0.5% · 3/4 AIs | |
| #67 | 30 mentions · 0.5% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #68 | 30 mentions · 0.5% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #69 | 30 mentions · 0.5% · 3/4 AIs | |
| #70 | 30 mentions · 0.5% · 3/4 AIs | |
| #71 | 29 mentions · 0.5% · 1/4 AIs | |
| #72 | 28 mentions · 0.5% · 2/4 AIs | |
| #73 | 27 mentions · 0.5% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #74 | 27 mentions · 0.5% · 3/4 AIs | |
| #75 | 27 mentions · 0.5% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #76 | 27 mentions · 0.5% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #77 | 27 mentions · 0.5% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #78 | 27 mentions · 0.5% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #79 | 27 mentions · 0.5% · 3/4 AIs | |
| #80 | 26 mentions · 0.5% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #81 | 26 mentions · 0.5% · 1/4 AIs | |
| #82 | 25 mentions · 0.4% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #83 | 25 mentions · 0.4% · 3/4 AIs | |
| #84 | 25 mentions · 0.4% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #85 | 25 mentions · 0.4% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #86 | 25 mentions · 0.4% · 3/4 AIs | |
| #87 | 25 mentions · 0.4% · 1/4 AIs | |
| #88 | 24 mentions · 0.4% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #89 | 24 mentions · 0.4% · 3/4 AIs | |
| #90 | 24 mentions · 0.4% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #91 | 24 mentions · 0.4% · 3/4 AIs | |
| #92 | 24 mentions · 0.4% · 2/4 AIs | |
| #93 | 23 mentions · 0.4% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #94 | 23 mentions · 0.4% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #95 | 23 mentions · 0.4% · 3/4 AIs | |
| #96 | 22 mentions · 0.4% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #97 | 22 mentions · 0.4% · 3/4 AIs | |
| #98 | 22 mentions · 0.4% · 3/4 AIs | |
| #99 | 22 mentions · 0.4% · 1/4 AIs | |
| #100 | 21 mentions · 0.4% · 3/4 AIs |
1,320 additional firms beyond rank 100 available via the JSON API (requires atlas API token).
No firms in this ranking match that search.
Request a scan
Don't see your firm above?
Most firms are tracked below the top 25 shown here — try the search bar at the top of the page first (Cmd+K). If your firm hasn't been scanned yet, tell us who you are and we'll add it. Result lands in your inbox, no account required.
Thanks — we've got your request.
We'll scan the assistants for your business and email the results to the address you gave. Usually within a week; sometimes faster if we're already scanning your vertical.
Sources cited by AI
Directories, associations, and other sources
These sources appeared in AI answers as places to research, verify, or compare businesses. We show them here because they helped shape the answers.
1. Matulewicz v Sullivan Papain Block McGrath Coffinas & Cannavo, P.C.
93 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
2. New York State Unified Court System
courts.state.ny.us
15 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
3. Martindale
13 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
4. Super Lawyers
13 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
5. Avvo
11 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
6. Federal Court PACER System
pacer.uscourts.gov
8 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
7. New York State Bar Association
nysba.org
7 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
8. American Association for Justice
3 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
9. New York State Trial Lawyers Association
3 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
10. NYC Bar Association
3 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
11. New York State Office of Court Administration (OCA)
3 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
12. Best Lawyers in America
bestlawyers.com
2 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
13. Arkansas Department of Health and Human Services v. Ahlborn
2 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
14. First Department Attorney Grievance Committee
2 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
15. New York State Department of Health
2 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
16. Third Judicial Department
1 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
17. National Board of Trial Advocacy
1 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
18. Reddit
1 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
19. Justia
1 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
20. Asian American Bar Association of New York
1 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
21. Supreme Court
1 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
22. Yelp
1 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
23. MTA Law Department
1 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
24. New York Court of Appeals
new york court of appeals
1 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
These sources can reveal where buyers and AI assistants research the market. Source mentions are reported separately from business rankings.
Sample buyer responses
editorial · not counted in rankingsVerbatim responses from prompts that ask for advice rather than firm recommendations. Excluded from ranking calculations.
"I was on a Citi Bike in New York City this morning and a parked car opened their door right into me. I'm at Mount Sinai with a broken collarbone. The driver took off. What do I do?"
1. **Greenberg & Stein, P.C.** - Known for handling bicycle accident cases and helping clients navigate hit-and-run incidents. 2. **Rosenbaum & Rosenbaum, P.C.** - Specializes in personal injury claims, including those involving cyclists. 3. **Parker Waichman LLP** - Offers extensive experience in representing victims of traffic accidents in NYC. 4. **Frekhtman & Associates** - Focuses on serious injury cases and has a track record with bicycle accidents. 5. **Block O'Toole &...
"How long do I actually have to file a personal injury case in New York City? I keep seeing different numbers online — 3 years, 90 days for the city, something different for medmal...."
In New York, the statute of limitations for personal injury cases is generally 3 years from the date of the accident. If the case involves a municipality like New York City, a notice of claim must be filed within 90 days, and the lawsuit must be filed within 1 year and 90 days. For medical malpractice, the statute of limitations is 2 years and 6 months from the date of the malpractice or the end of continuous treatment.
"Necesito un abogado de lesiones personales en New York City que hable español. Me atropelló un carro en el Bronx. No hablo inglés. Mi hermana me está ayudando pero ella tampoco ent..."
1. **Frekhtman & Associates** - Conocidos por su experiencia en casos de lesiones personales y ofrecen servicios en español. 2. **The Perecman Firm, P.L.L.C.** - Destacados en lesiones personales y cuentan con personal que habla español. 3. **Rosenberg, Minc, Falkoff & Wolff, LLP** - Especialistas en casos de accidentes y ofrecen asistencia en español. 4. **Cellino & Barnes** - Famosos por su enfoque en lesiones personales y tienen abogados que hablan español. 5. **Godosky &...
In-depth report
How AI recommends Personal Injury in New York City
A written breakdown of the current snapshot — which firms each assistant names, how concentrated the recommendations are, and what a buyer would actually see if they asked ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini or Perplexity today.
Further reading
Pillar guide
AI Search Rankings: A 2026 Guide
How AI search rankings work and how to read a response-mention-rate leaderboard.
Playbook
How to Rank in ChatGPT
The exact structure and language that makes an AI reuse your firm as an answer.
Concepts
Generative Engine Optimization (GEO)
GEO vs AEO vs SEO — definitions, metrics, and limitations.
Field notes on reading these rankings
All notes →AI SEO for Personal Injury Lawyers: Why the Market Is Still Open
AI SEO for personal injury lawyers looks different from AI SEO in other legal verticals because the market is still fragmented. In our NYC audit, the top PI fir...
Why Your Law Firm Can Rank in Google and Still Be Invisible to ChatGPT
Google rankings reward pages built for keywords. AI recommendations reward pages that answer a buyer situation clearly enough to be reused in an answer.
How to Read AI Search Rankings (Beyond Vanity Metrics)
AI search rankings measure how often assistants like ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Perplexity name a business when a buyer asks who to hire. Read for share of vo...
Don't see your business? Or ranked low?
See which prompts and assistants omit your business, then measure the effect of site changes.
Get a free AI visibility audit →Methodology v3.1 · latest snapshot: 828 AI responses and 15,823 business mentions · all-time corpus: 8,430 responses and 23,062 business mentions · Sep 15, 2026. 95% confidence intervals. Full methodology: viclaro.app/leaderboards/methodology.