New York City · Medical
IVF & Fertility
How to read the rankings
How to read the rankings
Columns
- Rank
- Position across all eligible AI responses for this market.
- Mentions
- AI responses that named this business.
- Response mention rate (±margin)
- Mentions divided by eligible responses. The ± is the 95% confidence margin.
- Per-AI columns
- Responses from each assistant that named the business; together they sum to Mentions.
The independent record of which businesses ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Perplexity put on the shortlist when New York City buyers describe what they need.
Model versions and response counts
openai/gpt-4o: 282 · perplexity/sonar: 282 · google/gemini-2.5-flash: 282 · anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.6: 282
Viclaro Atlas
A Viclaro publication · viclaro.app
All-time IVF & Fertility results
AI responses analyzed
7,814
of 96,898 across Atlas · 8.1%
Business mentions
37,536
of 403,245 across Atlas · 9.3%
Businesses named over time
2,054
of 34,867 across Atlas · 5.9%
Buyer questions tested
141
of 1,616 across Atlas · 8.7%
Published snapshots
16
of 177 across Atlas · 9.0%
Businesses ranked
1,899
across all eligible responses
These totals cover all published IVF & Fertility research. The all-time ranking uses 7,803 eligible AI responses collected since Jul 13, 2026.
Filters this ranking only. Use Atlas search above to search every market.
| #Rank | Business | HitsMentions | RateResponse mention rate | Claude | ChatGPT | Gemini | Perplexity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1 |
RMA of New York
Claude 1164
ChatGPT 1368
Gemini 551
Perplexity 854
|
3,937 | 50.5% ±1.1 | 1164 | 1368 | 551 | 854 |
| #2 |
NYU Langone Fertility Center
Claude 1287
ChatGPT 425
Gemini 728
Perplexity 879
|
3,319 | 42.5% ±1.1 | 1287 | 425 | 728 | 879 |
| #3 |
Columbia University Fertility Center
Claude 1095
ChatGPT 197
Gemini 925
Perplexity 526
|
2,743 | 35.2% ±1.1 | 1095 | 197 | 925 | 526 |
| #4 |
Weill Cornell Medicine Center for Reproductive Medicine and Infertility
Claude 379
ChatGPT 837
Gemini 615
Perplexity 392
|
2,223 | 28.5% ±1.0 | 379 | 837 | 615 | 392 |
| #5 |
CCRM Fertility of New York
Claude 180
ChatGPT 1180
Gemini 265
Perplexity 515
|
2,140 | 27.4% ±1.0 | 180 | 1180 | 265 | 515 |
| #6 |
New Hope Fertility Center
Claude 64
ChatGPT 1246
Gemini 144
Perplexity 360
|
1,814 | 23.2% ±0.9 | 64 | 1246 | 144 | 360 |
| #7 |
Reproductive Medicine Associates of New York (RMA NY)
Unverified
Claude 142
ChatGPT 65
Gemini 854
Perplexity 35
|
1,096 | 14.0% ±0.8 | 142 | 65 | 854 | 35 |
| #8 |
Extend Fertility
Claude 588
ChatGPT 205
Gemini 144
Perplexity 58
|
995 | 12.8% ±0.7 | 588 | 205 | 144 | 58 |
| #9 |
Spring Fertility
Claude 228
ChatGPT 2
Gemini 7
Perplexity 193
|
430 | 5.5% ±0.5 | 228 | 2 | 7 | 193 |
| #10 |
|
420 | 5.4% ±0.5 | 175 | 37 | 201 | 7 |
| #11 |
Center for Human Reproduction
Claude 39
ChatGPT 61
Gemini 61
Perplexity 247
|
408 | 5.2% ±0.5 | 39 | 61 | 61 | 247 |
| #12 |
Chelsea Fertility NYC
Claude 9
ChatGPT 4
Gemini 3
Perplexity 378
|
394 | 5.0% ±0.5 | 9 | 4 | 3 | 378 |
| #13 |
|
367 | 4.7% ±0.5 | 330 | 2 | 28 | 7 |
| #14 |
|
307 | 3.9% ±0.4 | 32 | 1 | 207 | 67 |
| #15 |
|
302 | 3.9% ±0.4 | 168 | 6 | 126 | 2 |
| #16 |
|
237 | 3.0% ±0.4 | 134 | 14 | 84 | 5 |
| #17 |
Tanmoy Mukherjee
Claude 198
ChatGPT 28
Gemini 1
Perplexity 5
|
232 | 3.0% ±0.4 | 198 | 28 | 1 | 5 |
| #18 |
|
222 | 2.8% ±0.4 | 205 | 1 | 10 | 6 |
| #19 |
Kofinas Fertility Group
Claude 28
ChatGPT 34
Gemini 26
Perplexity 133
|
221 | 2.8% ±0.4 | 28 | 34 | 26 | 133 |
| #20 |
|
206 | 2.6% ±0.4 | 87 | 32 | 12 | 75 |
| #21 |
|
196 | 2.5% ±0.3 | 53 | 1 | 138 | 4 |
| #22 |
|
195 | 2.5% ±0.3 | 1 | 1 | 14 | 179 |
| #23 |
|
176 | 2.3% ±0.3 | 21 | 1 | 153 | 1 |
| #24 |
GENESIS Fertility & Reproductive Medicine
Claude 2
ChatGPT 43
Gemini 6
Perplexity 102
|
153 | 2.0% ±0.3 | 2 | 43 | 6 | 102 |
| #25 |
|
145 | 1.9% ±0.3 | 0 | 12 | 133 | 0 |
Ranks #26–#100 (75 more businesses) click to expand
| #26 | 133 mentions · 1.7% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #27 | 123 mentions · 1.6% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #28 | 118 mentions · 1.5% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #29 | 118 mentions · 1.5% · 1/4 AIs | |
| #30 | 104 mentions · 1.3% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #31 | 102 mentions · 1.3% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #32 | 102 mentions · 1.3% · 3/4 AIs | |
| #33 | 97 mentions · 1.2% · 3/4 AIs | |
| #34 | 91 mentions · 1.2% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #35 | 89 mentions · 1.1% · 3/4 AIs | |
| #36 | 87 mentions · 1.1% · 2/4 AIs | |
| #37 | 85 mentions · 1.1% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #38 | 82 mentions · 1.1% · 3/4 AIs | |
| #39 | 81 mentions · 1.0% · 3/4 AIs | |
| #40 | 79 mentions · 1.0% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #41 | 79 mentions · 1.0% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #42 |
Innovation Fertility Preservation and IVF
www.fertilitypreservation.org
77 mentions · 1.0% · 4/4 AIs
|
77 mentions · 1.0% · 4/4 AIs |
| #43 | 76 mentions · 1.0% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #44 | 76 mentions · 1.0% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #45 | 76 mentions · 1.0% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #46 | 72 mentions · 0.9% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #47 | 69 mentions · 0.9% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #48 | 69 mentions · 0.9% · 2/4 AIs | |
| #49 | 68 mentions · 0.9% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #50 | 68 mentions · 0.9% · 3/4 AIs | |
| #51 | 66 mentions · 0.8% · 3/4 AIs | |
| #52 | 65 mentions · 0.8% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #53 | 63 mentions · 0.8% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #54 | 63 mentions · 0.8% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #55 | 60 mentions · 0.8% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #56 | 57 mentions · 0.7% · 3/4 AIs | |
| #57 | 55 mentions · 0.7% · 3/4 AIs | |
| #58 | 55 mentions · 0.7% · 1/4 AIs | |
| #59 |
Cornell University Weill Cornell Medicine Center for Reproductive Medicine
Unverified
55 mentions · 0.7% · 1/4 AIs
|
55 mentions · 0.7% · 1/4 AIs |
| #60 | 54 mentions · 0.7% · 3/4 AIs | |
| #61 | 53 mentions · 0.7% · 3/4 AIs | |
| #62 | 52 mentions · 0.7% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #63 | 50 mentions · 0.6% · 3/4 AIs | |
| #64 | 50 mentions · 0.6% · 1/4 AIs | |
| #65 | 49 mentions · 0.6% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #66 | 49 mentions · 0.6% · 2/4 AIs | |
| #67 | 49 mentions · 0.6% · 2/4 AIs | |
| #68 |
Montefiore Einstein Institute for Reproductive Medicine and Health
Unverified
49 mentions · 0.6% · 1/4 AIs
|
49 mentions · 0.6% · 1/4 AIs |
| #69 | 49 mentions · 0.6% · 2/4 AIs | |
| #70 | 48 mentions · 0.6% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #71 | 48 mentions · 0.6% · 2/4 AIs | |
| #72 | 47 mentions · 0.6% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #73 | 45 mentions · 0.6% · 3/4 AIs | |
| #74 | 45 mentions · 0.6% · 2/4 AIs | |
| #75 | 44 mentions · 0.6% · 2/4 AIs | |
| #76 | 43 mentions · 0.6% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #77 | 43 mentions · 0.6% · 2/4 AIs | |
| #78 | 40 mentions · 0.5% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #79 | 39 mentions · 0.5% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #80 | 38 mentions · 0.5% · 3/4 AIs | |
| #81 | 38 mentions · 0.5% · 3/4 AIs | |
| #82 | 38 mentions · 0.5% · 3/4 AIs | |
| #83 | 38 mentions · 0.5% · 3/4 AIs | |
| #84 | 37 mentions · 0.5% · 2/4 AIs | |
| #85 | 35 mentions · 0.4% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #86 | 34 mentions · 0.4% · 3/4 AIs | |
| #87 | 34 mentions · 0.4% · 3/4 AIs | |
| #88 | 34 mentions · 0.4% · 3/4 AIs | |
| #89 | 34 mentions · 0.4% · 1/4 AIs | |
| #90 | 33 mentions · 0.4% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #91 | 33 mentions · 0.4% · 2/4 AIs | |
| #92 | 33 mentions · 0.4% · 1/4 AIs | |
| #93 | 32 mentions · 0.4% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #94 | 31 mentions · 0.4% · 1/4 AIs | |
| #95 | 30 mentions · 0.4% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #96 | 30 mentions · 0.4% · 2/4 AIs | |
| #97 | 30 mentions · 0.4% · 2/4 AIs | |
| #98 | 30 mentions · 0.4% · 1/4 AIs | |
| #99 | 30 mentions · 0.4% · 2/4 AIs | |
| #100 | 30 mentions · 0.4% · 1/4 AIs |
1,799 additional firms beyond rank 100 available via the JSON API (requires atlas API token).
No firms in this ranking match that search.
Request a scan
Don't see your firm above?
Most firms are tracked below the top 25 shown here — try the search bar at the top of the page first (Cmd+K). If your firm hasn't been scanned yet, tell us who you are and we'll add it. Result lands in your inbox, no account required.
Thanks — we've got your request.
We'll scan the assistants for your business and email the results to the address you gave. Usually within a week; sometimes faster if we're already scanning your vertical.
Sources cited by AI
Directories, associations, and other sources
These sources appeared in AI answers as places to research, verify, or compare businesses. We show them here because they helped shape the answers.
1. SART.org
49 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
2. CDC ART
29 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
3. Bonei Olam
21 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
4. FertilityIQ
fertilityiq.com
21 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
5. Resolve: The National Infertility Association
19 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
6. Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology
15 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
7. Yelp
13 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
8. Healthgrades
healthgrades.com
13 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
9. Zocdoc
9 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
10. New York State Department of Health
8 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
11. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
4 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
12. Joint Commission
3 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
13. RealSelf.com
3 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
14. American Board of Obstetrics and Gynecology
3 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
15. Donor Sibling Registry
1 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
16. Mosaic Embryo Project
1 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
17. Consumer Frauds and Protection Bureau
1 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
18. NY Department of Health / Office of Professional Medical Conduct records
ny department of health
1 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
19. American Association of Tissue Banks
1 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
These sources can reveal where buyers and AI assistants research the market. Source mentions are reported separately from business rankings.
In-depth report
How AI recommends IVF & Fertility in New York City
A written breakdown of the current snapshot — which firms each assistant names, how concentrated the recommendations are, and what a buyer would actually see if they asked ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini or Perplexity today.
Further reading
Pillar guide
AI Search Rankings: A 2026 Guide
How AI search rankings work and how to read a response-mention-rate leaderboard.
Playbook
How to Rank in ChatGPT
The exact structure and language that makes an AI reuse your firm as an answer.
Concepts
Generative Engine Optimization (GEO)
GEO vs AEO vs SEO — definitions, metrics, and limitations.
Field notes on reading these rankings
All notes →How to Read AI Search Rankings (Beyond Vanity Metrics)
AI search rankings measure how often assistants like ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Perplexity name a business when a buyer asks who to hire. Read for share of vo...
How to Write Content That AI Assistants Actually Cite
Content that AI assistants cite looks different from content designed for humans or Google. It answers the buyer's exact question in a single quotable sentence,...
Why AI Recommendations Change Between Runs (and When a Change Is Real)
An assistant is not a laminated directory. Search results move, generated wording varies, and a tiny prompt edit can change the shortlist. The answer is not to...
Don't see your business? Or ranked low?
See which prompts and assistants omit your business, then measure the effect of site changes.
Get a free AI visibility audit →Methodology v1.0 · latest snapshot: 1,128 AI responses and 33,507 business mentions · all-time corpus: 7,814 responses and 37,536 business mentions · Sep 27, 2026. 95% confidence intervals. Full methodology: viclaro.app/leaderboards/methodology.