Divorce & Family Law / New York City
Denise Seidelman, Esq.
How to read this firm's data
How to read this firm's data
Header tiles
- Rank
- Position across all eligible AI responses in this market.
- Mention rate
- The share of eligible AI responses that named the business.
Charts
- Rank trend
- Each dot is one week of analyzed responses, newest on the right. A flat line means this firm's rank didn't move.
- Per-AI breakdown
- Responses from each assistant that named this firm.
- By question type
- Mentions grouped by what the buyer was asking.
Practice context for Divorce & Family Law · Not yet reviewed
A sourced business description has not been added yet. Assistant mentions alone do not verify the firm's services.
Practice eligibility has not been reviewed for this market. This is unknown, not an exclusion.
Practice evidence and AI measurements are assessed separately. Mentions do not establish suitability.
Market detail: Divorce & Family Law · New York City
Position
#175
pooled across every snapshot — 2,946 firms ever cited in this market
Mention rate
0.3%
pooled across every snapshot — 26 of 8,291 eligible responses
Rank vs mention rate
9 weeks · 70 days
Rank ranged #123 to #298 · mention rate 0.3%–0.5%
How to read this chart
How to read: each dot is one week of analyzed responses. The green line shows the business's rank that week. The dashed amber line shows the share of responses that named it.
Rank and mention rate use different scales, so the two lines are placed side-by-side, not on top of each other. A firm can hold rank while mention rate drifts (fewer responses named anyone) or improve rank without moving mention rate (peers dropped out).
Research details Historical appearances, assistant counts and question types · all roles, separate from qualified recommendations.
All-time results for this market
Business appeared Aug 5, 2026–Oct 14, 2026
- Responses analyzed
- 8,788
- Responses naming business
- 22
- Historical appearance rate
- 0.3%
- Dates with published rank
- 10
These raw appearance totals cover all retained responses for this city and category, across all question types and roles, including sources and incidental mentions. They are not qualified recommendation counts. Appearance dates show when responses named this business; published rank dates can include repeated use of those responses. Current rank and confidence use the latest dated ranking.
Per-AI breakdown
Counts cover all published Atlas research for this market.
- Claude
- 0 mentions
- ChatGPT
- 9 mentions
- Gemini
- 13 mentions
- Perplexity
- 0 mentions
By question type
All-time mentions grouped by the type of question the buyer asked.
- Situation
- 21 mentions
- Constraints
- 1 mention
Peer firms in New York City divorce & family law
Current ranks and mention rates · Oct 14, 2026 edition.
#1
Aronson Mayefsky & Sloan, LLP
32.3% current mention rate · 4/4 AI
#2
Berkman Bottger Newman & Schein
27.8% current mention rate · 4/4 AI
#3
Blank Rome LLP
24.8% current mention rate · 4/4 AI
#4
Kasowitz Benson Torres LLP
20.6% current mention rate · 4/4 AI
#5
Chemtob Moss & Forman LLP
20.3% current mention rate · 4/4 AI
#6
Cohen Clair Lans Greifer & Thorpe LLP
14.1% current mention rate · 3/4 AI
#7
Cohen Clair Lans Greifer Thorpe & Rottenstreich LLP
11.3% current mention rate · 4/4 AI
#8
Eleanor Alter
10.4% current mention rate · 4/4 AI
Unclaimed listing — claim this profile
Atlas created this profile after AI assistants named the business. Claim it to confirm the business details; we'll reply from support@viclaro.app.
Buyer questions and AI answers
Simulated buyer questions from Atlas’s test dataset, paired with AI answers that mentioned this firm or professional. Open to see the questions and what was said.
22 AI answers with recorded context · 0 reviewed in context
Atlas asks AI assistants questions written from the perspective of people seeking services in a particular city and situation. Each example connects a simulated buyer question to an answer that named this firm or professional. A name can appear as a recommendation, a related adviser, a comparison, or even an option the assistant advises against.
A mention does not verify services, eligibility or suitability. Context review explains how the name was used; it does not verify the assistant’s claims. Explore the test questions and methodology.
Simulated buyer question · Divorce & Family Law · New York City · Legal Our daughter was born via surrogate in 2023. We're a male same-sex couple in New York City. Now we're divorcing and my husband is questioning whether the second... google/gemini-2.5-flash 2026-10-14 14:15:18 How the name appeared: Uncertain Open question and AI answer
What the simulated buyer asked
Our daughter was born via surrogate in 2023. We're a male same-sex couple in New York City. Now we're divorcing and my husband is questioning whether the second-parent order in California still controls in NY. Who has actually litigated surrogacy fact patterns here?
…* * Melissa Brisman, Esq. (Law Offices of Melissa Brisman LLC): Known for reproductive law, including surrogacy and parentage, and has litigated complex cases. * Denise Seidelman, Esq. (Rumbold & Seidelman LLP): Specializes in adoption and assisted reproductive technology law, frequently handling parentage matters. * Natalie M. Handwerker, Esq. (Handwerker Law PLLC): Focuses on fertility, adoption, and family law, with extensive experience in parentage orders. * Joy S. Scheer, Esq. (Scheer Law Group, P.C.): Experie…
How to read this mention
The role of this name in the answer is uncertain or has not been reviewed.
Unreviewed contextual evidence; no qualification established.
Market: Divorce & Family Law · New York City · Legal
Factual accuracy: unverified · Practice fit: unknown
Context review: unreviewed. This is separate from practice eligibility and ranking.
No source URLs were recorded for this answer.
Simulated buyer question · Divorce & Family Law · New York City · Legal Our daughter was born via surrogate in 2023. We're a male same-sex couple in New York City. Now we're divorcing and my husband is questioning whether the second... openai/gpt-4o 2026-10-14 14:15:11 How the name appeared: Uncertain Open question and AI answer
What the simulated buyer asked
Our daughter was born via surrogate in 2023. We're a male same-sex couple in New York City. Now we're divorcing and my husband is questioning whether the second-parent order in California still controls in NY. Who has actually litigated surrogacy fact patterns here?
- Denise Seidelman, Esq. - Known for handling complex surrogacy and parentage cases in New York.
- Victoria Ferrara, Esq. - Experienced in surrogacy and family law, including interstate legal issues.
- Richard Vaughn, Esq. - Specializes in reproductive law and has experience with surrogacy cases across different states.
- Melissa Brisman, Esq. - Focuses on surrogacy and reproductive law, with a track record of handling interstate parentage orders.
How to read this mention
The role of this name in the answer is uncertain or has not been reviewed.
Unreviewed contextual evidence; no qualification established.
Market: Divorce & Family Law · New York City · Legal
Factual accuracy: unverified · Practice fit: unknown
Context review: unreviewed. This is separate from practice eligibility and ranking.
No source URLs were recorded for this answer.
Simulated buyer question · Divorce & Family Law · New York City · Legal Our daughter was born via surrogate in 2023. We're a male same-sex couple in New York City. Now we're divorcing and my husband is questioning whether the second... openai/gpt-4o 2026-10-14 14:15:09 How the name appeared: Uncertain Open question and AI answer
What the simulated buyer asked
Our daughter was born via surrogate in 2023. We're a male same-sex couple in New York City. Now we're divorcing and my husband is questioning whether the second-parent order in California still controls in NY. Who has actually litigated surrogacy fact patterns here?
No name-matched excerpt is available; the extracted appearance needs review.
How to read this mention
The role of this name in the answer is uncertain or has not been reviewed.
Unreviewed contextual evidence; no qualification established.
Market: Divorce & Family Law · New York City · Legal
Factual accuracy: unverified · Practice fit: unknown
Context review: unreviewed. This is separate from practice eligibility and ranking.
No source URLs were recorded for this answer.
Selected examples from the test dataset are shown here. Excerpts show part of an answer; full response records remain part of the audit. Each market has its own question set and sample, so these examples do not establish an overall rank.
Field notes on reading these rankings
Turn this ranking into a decision.
Get the complete competitive gap, the public evidence behind it, and the three changes worth testing first.
Request the competitive brief →