Divorce & Family Law / New York City
Garr Silpe, P.C.
How to read this firm's data
How to read this firm's data
Header tiles
- Rank
- Position across all eligible AI responses in this market.
- Mention rate
- The share of eligible AI responses that named the business.
Charts
- Rank trend
- Each dot is one week of analyzed responses, newest on the right. A flat line means this firm's rank didn't move.
- Per-AI breakdown
- Responses from each assistant that named this firm.
- By question type
- Mentions grouped by what the buyer was asking.
Practice context for Divorce & Family Law · Not yet reviewed
A sourced business description has not been added yet. Assistant mentions alone do not verify the firm's services.
Practice eligibility has not been reviewed for this market. This is unknown, not an exclusion.
Practice evidence and AI measurements are assessed separately. Mentions do not establish suitability.
Market detail: Divorce & Family Law · New York City
Position
#136
pooled across every snapshot — 2,946 firms ever cited in this market
Mention rate
0.4%
pooled across every snapshot — 37 of 8,291 eligible responses
Rank vs mention rate
9 weeks · 98 days
Rank ranged #54 to #379 · mention rate 0.1%–1.6%
How to read this chart
How to read: each dot is one week of analyzed responses. The green line shows the business's rank that week. The dashed amber line shows the share of responses that named it.
Rank and mention rate use different scales, so the two lines are placed side-by-side, not on top of each other. A firm can hold rank while mention rate drifts (fewer responses named anyone) or improve rank without moving mention rate (peers dropped out).
Research details Historical appearances, assistant counts and question types · all roles, separate from qualified recommendations.
All-time results for this market
Business appeared Jun 26, 2026–Sep 28, 2026
- Responses analyzed
- 8,788
- Responses naming business
- 9
- Historical appearance rate
- 0.1%
- Dates with published rank
- 10
These raw appearance totals cover all retained responses for this city and category, across all question types and roles, including sources and incidental mentions. They are not qualified recommendation counts. Appearance dates show when responses named this business; published rank dates can include repeated use of those responses. Current rank and confidence use the latest dated ranking.
Per-AI breakdown
Counts cover all published Atlas research for this market.
- Claude
- 1 mention
- ChatGPT
- 8 mentions
- Gemini
- 0 mentions
- Perplexity
- 0 mentions
By question type
All-time mentions grouped by the type of question the buyer asked.
- Situation
- 3 mentions
- Decision
- 6 mentions
Peer firms in New York City divorce & family law
Current ranks and mention rates · Oct 14, 2026 edition.
#1
Aronson Mayefsky & Sloan, LLP
32.3% current mention rate · 4/4 AI
#2
Berkman Bottger Newman & Schein
27.8% current mention rate · 4/4 AI
#3
Blank Rome LLP
24.8% current mention rate · 4/4 AI
#4
Kasowitz Benson Torres LLP
20.6% current mention rate · 4/4 AI
#5
Chemtob Moss & Forman LLP
20.3% current mention rate · 4/4 AI
#6
Cohen Clair Lans Greifer & Thorpe LLP
14.1% current mention rate · 3/4 AI
#7
Cohen Clair Lans Greifer Thorpe & Rottenstreich LLP
11.3% current mention rate · 4/4 AI
#8
Eleanor Alter
10.4% current mention rate · 4/4 AI
Own this business? Get a free ranking preview
Is this your firm?
Get a short preview showing one buyer question where AI assistants name Garr Silpe, P.C. or a competitor. Emailed from support@viclaro.app within one business day. See the paid brief format →
Buyer questions and AI answers
Simulated buyer questions from Atlas’s test dataset, paired with AI answers that mentioned this firm or professional. Open to see the questions and what was said.
9 AI answers with recorded context · 0 reviewed in context
Atlas asks AI assistants questions written from the perspective of people seeking services in a particular city and situation. Each example connects a simulated buyer question to an answer that named this firm or professional. A name can appear as a recommendation, a related adviser, a comparison, or even an option the assistant advises against.
A mention does not verify services, eligibility or suitability. Context review explains how the name was used; it does not verify the assistant’s claims. Explore the test questions and methodology.
Simulated buyer question · Divorce & Family Law · New York City · Legal I'm a tech exec in New York City, comp is mostly RSUs vesting over 4 years plus a chunk of pre-IPO from my last company. Wife filed. The valuation fight on unve... openai/gpt-4o 2026-09-28 18:07:48 How the name appeared: Uncertain Open question and AI answer
What the simulated buyer asked
I'm a tech exec in New York City, comp is mostly RSUs vesting over 4 years plus a chunk of pre-IPO from my last company. Wife filed. The valuation fight on unvested equity is going to be the whole case. Who is actually good with comp-heavy executive divorces?
…ant assets. 4. Jacqueline Newman of Berkman Bottger Newman & Schein LLP - Experienced in cases with complex financial structures, including RSUs and pre-IPO equity. 5. Ira Garr of Garr Silpe P.C. - Known for his work in divorces involving intricate financial and asset disputes.
How to read this mention
The role of this name in the answer is uncertain or has not been reviewed.
Unreviewed contextual evidence; no qualification established.
Market: Divorce & Family Law · New York City · Legal
Factual accuracy: unverified · Practice fit: unknown
Context review: unreviewed. This is separate from practice eligibility and ranking.
No source URLs were recorded for this answer.
Simulated buyer question · Divorce & Family Law · New York City · Legal Give me five New York City divorce attorneys ranked by reputation for high-net-worth contested cases. Just names, comma separated, with the firm. No commentary,... anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.6 2026-09-28 17:37:49 How the name appeared: Uncertain Open question and AI answer
What the simulated buyer asked
Give me five New York City divorce attorneys ranked by reputation for high-net-worth contested cases. Just names, comma separated, with the firm. No commentary, no caveats.
…Bernard Clair, Clair Gjertsen & Weathers; Robert Cohen, Cohen Clair Lans Greifer Thorpe & Rottenstreich; William Beslow, Cohen Clair Lans Greifer Thorpe & Rottenstreich; Ira Garr, Garr Silpe.
How to read this mention
The role of this name in the answer is uncertain or has not been reviewed.
Unreviewed contextual evidence; no qualification established.
Market: Divorce & Family Law · New York City · Legal
Factual accuracy: unverified · Practice fit: unknown
Context review: unreviewed. This is separate from practice eligibility and ranking.
No source URLs were recorded for this answer.
Simulated buyer question · Divorce & Family Law · New York City · Legal Give me five New York City divorce attorneys ranked by reputation for high-net-worth contested cases. Just names, comma separated, with the firm. No commentary,... openai/gpt-4o 2026-09-21 17:39:34 How the name appeared: Uncertain Open question and AI answer
What the simulated buyer asked
Give me five New York City divorce attorneys ranked by reputation for high-net-worth contested cases. Just names, comma separated, with the firm. No commentary, no caveats.
…n, Cohen Clair Lans Greifer Thorpe & Rottenstreich LLP, Bernard E. Clair, Cohen Clair Lans Greifer Thorpe & Rottenstreich LLP, Eleanor Alter, Alter Wolff & Foley LLP, Ira E. Garr, Garr Silpe P.C., William D. Zabel, Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP.
How to read this mention
The role of this name in the answer is uncertain or has not been reviewed.
Unreviewed contextual evidence; no qualification established.
Market: Divorce & Family Law · New York City · Legal
Factual accuracy: unverified · Practice fit: unknown
Context review: unreviewed. This is separate from practice eligibility and ranking.
No source URLs were recorded for this answer.
Selected examples from the test dataset are shown here. Excerpts show part of an answer; full response records remain part of the audit. Each market has its own question set and sample, so these examples do not establish an overall rank.
Field notes on reading these rankings
Turn this ranking into a decision.
Get the complete competitive gap, the public evidence behind it, and the three changes worth testing first.
Request the competitive brief →