Divorce & Family Law / New York City
Reproductive Possibilities
How to read this firm's data
How to read this firm's data
Header tiles
- Rank
- Position among businesses named in the latest scan.
- Mention rate
- The share of eligible AI responses in the current ranking that named the business.
Charts
- Rank trend
- Each dot is one published ranking, newest on the right. A flat line means this firm's rank didn't move.
- Per-AI breakdown
- Responses from each assistant that named this firm.
- By question type
- Mentions grouped by what the buyer was asking.
Practice context for Divorce & Family Law · Not yet reviewed
A sourced business description has not been added yet. Assistant mentions alone do not verify the firm's services.
Practice eligibility has not been reviewed for this market. This is unknown, not an exclusion.
Practice evidence and AI measurements are assessed separately. Mentions do not establish suitability.
Market detail: Divorce & Family Law · New York City
Position
#590
of 772 firms · Oct 14, 2026
Mention rate
0.1%
1 of 776 eligible responses
Rank vs mention rate
2 snapshots · 16 days
Rank ranged #327 to #590 · mention rate 0.1%–0.3%
How to read this chart
How to read: each dot is one snapshot. The green line is where this firm ranked among peers on that day. The dashed amber line is the mention rate — the share of AI responses in that snapshot that named this firm at all.
Rank and mention rate use different scales, so the two lines are placed side-by-side, not on top of each other. A firm can hold rank while mention rate drifts (fewer responses named anyone) or improve rank without moving mention rate (peers dropped out).
Research details Historical appearances, assistant counts and question types · all roles, separate from qualified recommendations.
All-time results for this market
Business appeared Sep 28, 2026–Oct 14, 2026
- Responses analyzed
- 8,788
- Responses naming business
- 3
- Historical appearance rate
- <0.1%
- Dates with published rank
- 2
These raw appearance totals cover all retained responses for this city and category, across all question types and roles, including sources and incidental mentions. They are not qualified recommendation counts. Appearance dates show when responses named this business; published rank dates can include repeated use of those responses. Current rank and confidence use the latest dated ranking.
Per-AI breakdown
Counts cover all published Atlas research for this market.
- Claude
- 3 mentions
- ChatGPT
- 0 mentions
- Gemini
- 0 mentions
- Perplexity
- 0 mentions
Dependent on one AI. The other three assistants recorded no mentions in the published results.
By question type
All-time mentions grouped by the type of question the buyer asked.
- Situation
- 3 mentions
Peer firms in New York City divorce & family law
Current ranks and mention rates · Oct 14, 2026 edition.
#1
Aronson Mayefsky & Sloan, LLP
31.1% current mention rate · 4/4 AI
#2
Berkman Bottger Newman & Schein
27.6% current mention rate · 4/4 AI
#3
Blank Rome LLP
25.6% current mention rate · 4/4 AI
#4
Kasowitz Benson Torres LLP
23.3% current mention rate · 4/4 AI
#5
Chemtob Moss & Forman LLP
21.5% current mention rate · 4/4 AI
#6
Cohen Clair Lans Greifer & Thorpe LLP
18.0% current mention rate · 2/4 AI
#7
Cohen Clair Lans Greifer Thorpe & Rottenstreich LLP
11.9% current mention rate · 4/4 AI
#8
Eleanor Alter
11.6% current mention rate · 4/4 AI
Unclaimed listing — claim this profile
Atlas created this profile after AI assistants named the business. Claim it to confirm the business details; we'll reply from support@viclaro.app.
Buyer questions and AI answers
Simulated buyer questions from Atlas’s test dataset, paired with AI answers that mentioned this firm or professional. Open to see the questions and what was said.
3 AI answers with recorded context · 0 reviewed in context
Atlas asks AI assistants questions written from the perspective of people seeking services in a particular city and situation. Each example connects a simulated buyer question to an answer that named this firm or professional. A name can appear as a recommendation, a related adviser, a comparison, or even an option the assistant advises against.
A mention does not verify services, eligibility or suitability. Context review explains how the name was used; it does not verify the assistant’s claims. Explore the test questions and methodology.
Simulated buyer question · Divorce & Family Law · New York City · Legal Our daughter was born via surrogate in 2023. We're a male same-sex couple in New York City. Now we're divorcing and my husband is questioning whether the second... anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.6 2026-10-14 14:14:57 How the name appeared: Uncertain Open question and AI answer
What the simulated buyer asked
Our daughter was born via surrogate in 2023. We're a male same-sex couple in New York City. Now we're divorcing and my husband is questioning whether the second-parent order in California still controls in NY. Who has actually litigated surrogacy fact patterns here?
…atise on multi-state surrogacy parentage conflicts
- Anthony Brown (Brown & Charbonneau) — known for interstate surrogacy enforcement in NY family court
- Melissa Brisman (Reproductive Possibilities, NJ/NY) — primarily transactional but litigates when parentage is contested
- Wendy Kramer / Hogan Lovells family law group — handles high-asset same-sex divorce with surrogacy complications
- Diana Adams (Diana Adams Law & Mediation) — NYC-based, LGBTQ+ family dissolution specialist, has handled CPSA-era disputes
- Joanna Grossman (Hofstr…
How to read this mention
The role of this name in the answer is uncertain or has not been reviewed.
Unreviewed contextual evidence; no qualification established.
Market: Divorce & Family Law · New York City · Legal
Factual accuracy: unverified · Practice fit: unknown
Context review: unreviewed. This is separate from practice eligibility and ranking.
No source URLs were recorded for this answer.
Simulated buyer question · Divorce & Family Law · New York City · Legal Our daughter was born via surrogate in 2023. We're a male same-sex couple in New York City. Now we're divorcing and my husband is questioning whether the second... anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.6 2026-09-28 18:02:41 How the name appeared: Uncertain Open question and AI answer
What the simulated buyer asked
Our daughter was born via surrogate in 2023. We're a male same-sex couple in New York City. Now we're divorcing and my husband is questioning whether the second-parent order in California still controls in NY. Who has actually litigated surrogacy fact patterns here?
…ctual NY surrogacy/ART family law litigation experience:**
- Deborah Dwyer (Dwyer Family Law) – handles high-conflict ART parentage disputes in NY courts
- Melissa Brisman (Reproductive Possibilities) – nationally known surrogacy attorney, frequently involved when prior orders are contested
- Tara Lerman (Lerman Law) – NY-focused ART and parentage, including post-CPSA enforcement issues
- Beth Littrell (Lambda Legal) – impact litigation on LGBTQ+ parentage, relevant if constitutional arguments surface
- Joanne Indriolo (Blank Rome) –…
How to read this mention
The role of this name in the answer is uncertain or has not been reviewed.
Unreviewed contextual evidence; no qualification established.
Market: Divorce & Family Law · New York City · Legal
Factual accuracy: unverified · Practice fit: unknown
Context review: unreviewed. This is separate from practice eligibility and ranking.
No source URLs were recorded for this answer.
Simulated buyer question · Divorce & Family Law · New York City · Legal Our daughter was born via surrogate in 2023. We're a male same-sex couple in New York City. Now we're divorcing and my husband is questioning whether the second... anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.6 2026-09-28 18:02:31 How the name appeared: Uncertain Open question and AI answer
What the simulated buyer asked
Our daughter was born via surrogate in 2023. We're a male same-sex couple in New York City. Now we're divorcing and my husband is questioning whether the second-parent order in California still controls in NY. Who has actually litigated surrogacy fact patterns here?
…Brown (Blank Rome)** – reproductive law intersecting with divorce litigation
- Wendy Schectman – solo practitioner, deep CPSA and surrogacy parentage work
- Melissa Brisman (Reproductive Possibilities) – primarily formation side but has consulted on parentage disputes
Key pressure point for your case: If the California order was a pre-birth or post-birth parentage judgment (not merely a second-parent adoption), NY courts under the CPSA treat that recognition as essentially automatic. Get the California order's exact language in front of…
How to read this mention
The role of this name in the answer is uncertain or has not been reviewed.
Unreviewed contextual evidence; no qualification established.
Market: Divorce & Family Law · New York City · Legal
Factual accuracy: unverified · Practice fit: unknown
Context review: unreviewed. This is separate from practice eligibility and ranking.
No source URLs were recorded for this answer.
Selected examples from the test dataset are shown here. Excerpts show part of an answer; full response records remain part of the audit. Each market has its own question set and sample, so these examples do not establish an overall rank.
Field notes on reading these rankings
Turn this ranking into a decision.
Get the complete competitive gap, the public evidence behind it, and the three changes worth testing first.
Request the competitive brief →