New York City · Legal
Employment Law (Plaintiff)
How to read the rankings
How to read the rankings
Columns
- Rank
- Position in the ranking within the latest snapshot.
- Mentions
- Latest-snapshot AI responses that named this business.
- Response mention rate (±margin)
- Mentions ÷ latest-snapshot AI responses. The ± is the 95% confidence margin.
- Per-AI columns
- Responses from each assistant that named the business; together they sum to Mentions.
The independent record of which businesses ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Perplexity put on the shortlist when New York City buyers describe what they need.
Model versions and response counts
openai/gpt-4o: 200 · perplexity/sonar: 200 · google/gemini-2.5-flash: 200 · anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.6: 200
Viclaro Atlas
A Viclaro publication · viclaro.app
All-time Employment Law (Plaintiff) results
AI responses analyzed
7,979
of 96,898 across Atlas · 8.2%
Business mentions
31,542
of 403,245 across Atlas · 7.8%
Businesses named over time
2,125
of 34,867 across Atlas · 6.1%
Buyer questions tested
147
of 1,616 across Atlas · 9.1%
Published snapshots
21
of 177 across Atlas · 12%
Businesses ranked
772
in the latest snapshot
These totals cover all published Employment Law (Plaintiff) research. The current ranking uses 800 eligible AI responses from Sep 27, 2026.
Filters this ranking only. Use Atlas search above to search every market.
| #Rank | Business | HitsMentions | RateResponse mention rate | Clauden=200 | ChatGPTn=200 | Geminin=200 | Perplexityn=200 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1 |
Outten & Golden LLP
Claude 112
ChatGPT 119
Gemini 101
Perplexity 22
|
354 | 44.3% ±3.4 | 112 | 119 | 101 | 22 |
| #2 |
Wigdor LLP
Claude 103
ChatGPT 44
Gemini 117
Perplexity 43
|
307 | 38.4% ±3.4 | 103 | 44 | 117 | 43 |
| #3 |
Sanford Heisler Sharp McKnight
Claude 56
ChatGPT 71
Gemini 107
Perplexity 35
|
269 | 33.6% ±3.3 | 56 | 71 | 107 | 35 |
| #4 |
Vladeck, Raskin & Clark, PC
Claude 60
ChatGPT 73
Gemini 74
Perplexity 13
|
220 | 27.5% ±3.1 | 60 | 73 | 74 | 13 |
| #5 |
Phillips & Associates
Claude 70
ChatGPT 13
Gemini 75
Perplexity 43
|
201 | 25.1% ±3.0 | 70 | 13 | 75 | 43 |
| #6 |
|
40 | 5.0% ±1.5 | 12 | 12 | 16 | 0 |
| #7 |
|
39 | 4.9% ±1.5 | 39 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| #8 |
|
38 | 4.8% ±1.5 | 19 | 12 | 4 | 3 |
| #9 |
Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP
Claude 4
ChatGPT 13
Gemini 7
Perplexity 5
|
29 | 3.6% ±1.3 | 4 | 13 | 7 | 5 |
| #10 |
|
28 | 3.5% ±1.3 | 12 | 0 | 4 | 12 |
| #11 |
|
27 | 3.4% ±1.3 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 9 |
| #12 |
|
24 | 3.0% ±1.2 | 13 | 5 | 6 | 0 |
| #13 |
Liddle & Robinson
Claude 4
ChatGPT 10
Gemini 4
Perplexity 4
|
22 | 2.8% ±1.2 | 4 | 10 | 4 | 4 |
| #14 |
|
22 | 2.8% ±1.2 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 11 |
| #15 |
Lipsky Lowe LLP
Claude 3
ChatGPT 7
Gemini 2
Perplexity 7
|
19 | 2.4% ±1.1 | 3 | 7 | 2 | 7 |
| #16 |
|
19 | 2.4% ±1.1 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 6 |
| #17 |
|
19 | 2.4% ±1.1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 19 |
| #18 |
|
19 | 2.4% ±1.1 | 19 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| #19 |
|
18 | 2.3% ±1.1 | 7 | 6 | 1 | 4 |
| #20 |
|
18 | 2.3% ±1.1 | 14 | 0 | 4 | 0 |
| #21 |
|
17 | 2.1% ±1.0 | 5 | 10 | 1 | 1 |
| #22 |
Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP
Claude 2
ChatGPT 5
Gemini 0
Perplexity 10
|
17 | 2.1% ±1.0 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 10 |
| #23 |
|
17 | 2.1% ±1.0 | 7 | 6 | 4 | 0 |
| #24 |
|
17 | 2.1% ±1.0 | 0 | 17 | 0 | 0 |
| #25 |
|
16 | 2.0% ±1.0 | 1 | 6 | 8 | 1 |
Ranks #26–#100 (75 more businesses) click to expand
| #26 | 16 mentions · 2.0% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #27 | 16 mentions · 2.0% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #28 | 16 mentions · 2.0% · 2/4 AIs | |
| #29 | 16 mentions · 2.0% · 2/4 AIs | |
| #30 | 14 mentions · 1.8% · 3/4 AIs | |
| #31 | 14 mentions · 1.8% · 2/4 AIs | |
| #32 | 13 mentions · 1.6% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #33 | 13 mentions · 1.6% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #34 | 13 mentions · 1.6% · 3/4 AIs | |
| #35 | 13 mentions · 1.6% · 1/4 AIs | |
| #36 | 12 mentions · 1.5% · 3/4 AIs | |
| #37 | 12 mentions · 1.5% · 3/4 AIs | |
| #38 | 12 mentions · 1.5% · 3/4 AIs | |
| #39 | 12 mentions · 1.5% · 2/4 AIs | |
| #40 | 12 mentions · 1.5% · 2/4 AIs | |
| #41 | 11 mentions · 1.4% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #42 | 11 mentions · 1.4% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #43 | 11 mentions · 1.4% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #44 | 11 mentions · 1.4% · 3/4 AIs | |
| #45 | 11 mentions · 1.4% · 3/4 AIs | |
| #46 | 11 mentions · 1.4% · 2/4 AIs | |
| #47 | 10 mentions · 1.3% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #48 | 10 mentions · 1.3% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #49 | 10 mentions · 1.3% · 3/4 AIs | |
| #50 | 10 mentions · 1.3% · 3/4 AIs | |
| #51 | 10 mentions · 1.3% · 2/4 AIs | |
| #52 | 10 mentions · 1.3% · 2/4 AIs | |
| #53 | 10 mentions · 1.3% · 2/4 AIs | |
| #54 | 9 mentions · 1.1% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #55 | 9 mentions · 1.1% · 3/4 AIs | |
| #56 | 9 mentions · 1.1% · 3/4 AIs | |
| #57 | 9 mentions · 1.1% · 3/4 AIs | |
| #58 | 9 mentions · 1.1% · 3/4 AIs | |
| #59 | 9 mentions · 1.1% · 2/4 AIs | |
| #60 | 9 mentions · 1.1% · 2/4 AIs | |
| #61 | 8 mentions · 1.0% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #62 | 8 mentions · 1.0% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #63 | 8 mentions · 1.0% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #64 | 8 mentions · 1.0% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #65 | 8 mentions · 1.0% · 2/4 AIs | |
| #66 | 8 mentions · 1.0% · 2/4 AIs | |
| #67 | 8 mentions · 1.0% · 2/4 AIs | |
| #68 | 8 mentions · 1.0% · 2/4 AIs | |
| #69 | 8 mentions · 1.0% · 2/4 AIs | |
| #70 | 7 mentions · 0.9% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #71 | 7 mentions · 0.9% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #72 | 7 mentions · 0.9% · 3/4 AIs | |
| #73 | 7 mentions · 0.9% · 3/4 AIs | |
| #74 | 7 mentions · 0.9% · 3/4 AIs | |
| #75 | 7 mentions · 0.9% · 3/4 AIs | |
| #76 | 7 mentions · 0.9% · 2/4 AIs | |
| #77 | 7 mentions · 0.9% · 2/4 AIs | |
| #78 | 7 mentions · 0.9% · 2/4 AIs | |
| #79 | 7 mentions · 0.9% · 2/4 AIs | |
| #80 | 7 mentions · 0.9% · 2/4 AIs | |
| #81 | 7 mentions · 0.9% · 2/4 AIs | |
| #82 | 6 mentions · 0.8% · 3/4 AIs | |
| #83 | 6 mentions · 0.8% · 3/4 AIs | |
| #84 | 6 mentions · 0.8% · 3/4 AIs | |
| #85 | 6 mentions · 0.8% · 3/4 AIs | |
| #86 | 6 mentions · 0.8% · 3/4 AIs | |
| #87 | 6 mentions · 0.8% · 3/4 AIs | |
| #88 | 6 mentions · 0.8% · 3/4 AIs | |
| #89 | 6 mentions · 0.8% · 3/4 AIs | |
| #90 | 6 mentions · 0.8% · 2/4 AIs | |
| #91 | 6 mentions · 0.8% · 2/4 AIs | |
| #92 | 6 mentions · 0.8% · 2/4 AIs | |
| #93 | 6 mentions · 0.8% · 2/4 AIs | |
| #94 | 6 mentions · 0.8% · 2/4 AIs | |
| #95 | 6 mentions · 0.8% · 2/4 AIs | |
| #96 | 6 mentions · 0.8% · 2/4 AIs | |
| #97 | 6 mentions · 0.8% · 2/4 AIs | |
| #98 | 6 mentions · 0.8% · 2/4 AIs | |
| #99 | 6 mentions · 0.8% · 1/4 AIs | |
| #100 | 6 mentions · 0.8% · 1/4 AIs |
672 additional firms beyond rank 100 available via the JSON API (requires atlas API token).
No firms in this ranking match that search.
Request a scan
Don't see your firm above?
Most firms are tracked below the top 25 shown here — try the search bar at the top of the page first (Cmd+K). If your firm hasn't been scanned yet, tell us who you are and we'll add it. Result lands in your inbox, no account required.
Thanks — we've got your request.
We'll scan the assistants for your business and email the results to the address you gave. Usually within a week; sometimes faster if we're already scanning your vertical.
Sources cited by AI
Directories, associations, and other sources
These sources appeared in AI answers as places to research, verify, or compare businesses. We show them here because they helped shape the answers.
1. NYC Commission on Human Rights
59 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
2. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC)
24 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
3. U.S. District Court - Southern District of New York
nysd.uscourts.gov
13 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
4. Super Lawyers
11 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
5. Avvo
8 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
6. Martindale
8 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
7. 2026 Best Lawyers in America
7 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
8. New York State Department of Labor
new york state department of labor
6 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
9. NYC Bar Association Lawyer Referral
6 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
10. NYC Department of Consumer and Worker Protection
5 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
11. National Employment Lawyers Association (NELA) - New York Chapter
4 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
12. New York State Nurses Association (NYSNA)
4 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
13. NYC Department of Investigation
3 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
14. New York City Department of Investigation (DOI) - Office of the Inspector General
3 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
15. Yelp
3 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
16. NYC Bar Association
3 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
17. NELA (National Employment Law Association)
3 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
18. Supreme Court
2 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
19. NYC Department of Education
nyc department of education
2 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
20. Civil Service Commission
2 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
21. Appellate Division, First Department
2 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
22. New York State Unified Court System
courts.state.ny.us
2 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
23. American Diabetes Association
2 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
24. Federal and state court dockets
1 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
25. New York State court dockets
1 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
26. American Medical Association
1 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
27. New York State Attorney General’s Civil Rights Bureau
1 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
28. New York State Department of Health
1 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
29. New York State Unified Court System
1 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
30. Justia
1 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
These sources can reveal where buyers and AI assistants research the market. Source mentions are reported separately from business rankings.
Sample buyer responses
editorial · not counted in rankingsVerbatim responses from prompts that ask for advice rather than firm recommendations. Excluded from ranking calculations.
"They offered me $45K severance to leave my job in New York City. I'm 47, I was there 11 years, I make $140K. Is that a fair number or am I being lowballed?"
A $45K severance for someone with 11 years at a company and a $140K salary may be considered low, as severance packages often range from one to two weeks of pay per year of service. It's advisable to negotiate for a higher amount. You might consider consulting with the following employment law firms or attorneys in NYC for personalized advice: 1. Outten & Golden LLP - Known for employee rights and severance negotiations. 2. Phillips & Associates - Specializes in employment l...
"If New York is an 'at-will' state can I really be fired for anything? People keep saying I have rights but also that I can be fired without a reason. Which is it? Working in New Yo..."
In New York, as an 'at-will' employment state, you can be fired for any reason that is not illegal, such as discrimination based on race, gender, age, religion, disability, or retaliation for whistleblowing. You do have rights under federal and state laws that protect against wrongful termination.
"I need an employment attorney in New York City who speaks Mandarin. I work in a garment factory. Wage issues going back years. My English is okay but my coworkers need someone who..."
1. **Wang Law Office, PLLC** - Known for handling employment law cases and offering services in Mandarin. 2. **Zeng Law Group, PLLC** - Specializes in employment and labor law, provides Mandarin-speaking services. 3. **Yin & Associates, P.C.** - Offers legal assistance for employment disputes with Mandarin-speaking attorneys.
In-depth report
How AI recommends Employment Law (Plaintiff) in New York City
A written breakdown of the current snapshot — which firms each assistant names, how concentrated the recommendations are, and what a buyer would actually see if they asked ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini or Perplexity today.
Further reading
Pillar guide
AI Search Rankings: A 2026 Guide
How AI search rankings work and how to read a response-mention-rate leaderboard.
Playbook
How to Rank in ChatGPT
The exact structure and language that makes an AI reuse your firm as an answer.
Concepts
Generative Engine Optimization (GEO)
GEO vs AEO vs SEO — definitions, metrics, and limitations.
Field notes on reading these rankings
All notes →Why Your Law Firm Can Rank in Google and Still Be Invisible to ChatGPT
Google rankings reward pages built for keywords. AI recommendations reward pages that answer a buyer situation clearly enough to be reused in an answer.
How to Read AI Search Rankings (Beyond Vanity Metrics)
AI search rankings measure how often assistants like ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Perplexity name a business when a buyer asks who to hire. Read for share of vo...
How to Write Content That AI Assistants Actually Cite
Content that AI assistants cite looks different from content designed for humans or Google. It answers the buyer's exact question in a single quotable sentence,...
Don't see your business? Or ranked low?
See which prompts and assistants omit your business, then measure the effect of site changes.
Get a free AI visibility audit →Methodology v3.1 · latest snapshot: 800 AI responses and 3,564 business mentions · all-time corpus: 7,979 responses and 31,542 business mentions · Sep 27, 2026. 95% confidence intervals. Full methodology: viclaro.app/leaderboards/methodology.