New York City · Legal
Employment Law (Plaintiff)
How to read the rankings
How to read the rankings
Columns
- Rank
- Position across all eligible AI responses for this market.
- Mentions
- AI responses that named this business.
- Response mention rate (±margin)
- Mentions divided by eligible responses. The ± is the 95% confidence margin.
- Per-AI columns
- Responses from each assistant that named the business; together they sum to Mentions.
The independent record of which businesses ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Perplexity put on the shortlist when New York City buyers describe what they need.
Model versions and response counts
openai/gpt-4o: 200 · perplexity/sonar: 200 · google/gemini-2.5-flash: 200 · anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.6: 200
Viclaro Atlas
A Viclaro publication · viclaro.app
All-time Employment Law (Plaintiff) results
AI responses analyzed
7,979
of 96,898 across Atlas · 8.2%
Business mentions
31,542
of 403,245 across Atlas · 7.8%
Businesses named over time
2,125
of 34,867 across Atlas · 6.1%
Buyer questions tested
147
of 1,616 across Atlas · 9.1%
Published snapshots
21
of 177 across Atlas · 12%
Businesses ranked
1,944
across all eligible responses
These totals cover all published Employment Law (Plaintiff) research. The all-time ranking uses 5,343 eligible AI responses collected since Jun 26, 2026.
Filters this ranking only. Use Atlas search above to search every market.
| #Rank | Business | HitsMentions | RateResponse mention rate | Claude | ChatGPT | Gemini | Perplexity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #1 |
Outten & Golden LLP
Claude 709
ChatGPT 795
Gemini 640
Perplexity 172
|
2,316 | 43.3% ±1.3 | 709 | 795 | 640 | 172 |
| #2 |
Wigdor LLP
Claude 714
ChatGPT 302
Gemini 782
Perplexity 259
|
2,057 | 38.5% ±1.3 | 714 | 302 | 782 | 259 |
| #3 |
Sanford Heisler Sharp McKnight
Claude 371
ChatGPT 492
Gemini 629
Perplexity 119
|
1,611 | 30.2% ±1.2 | 371 | 492 | 629 | 119 |
| #4 |
Vladeck, Raskin & Clark, PC
Claude 319
ChatGPT 489
Gemini 457
Perplexity 84
|
1,349 | 25.2% ±1.2 | 319 | 489 | 457 | 84 |
| #5 |
Phillips & Associates
Claude 468
ChatGPT 82
Gemini 479
Perplexity 281
|
1,310 | 24.5% ±1.2 | 468 | 82 | 479 | 281 |
| #6 |
|
502 | 9.4% ±0.8 | 2 | 249 | 250 | 1 |
| #7 |
|
270 | 5.1% ±0.6 | 83 | 70 | 115 | 2 |
| #8 |
|
230 | 4.3% ±0.5 | 85 | 81 | 26 | 38 |
| #9 |
|
226 | 4.2% ±0.5 | 226 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| #10 |
|
189 | 3.5% ±0.5 | 90 | 6 | 34 | 59 |
| #11 |
|
170 | 3.2% ±0.5 | 81 | 40 | 20 | 29 |
| #12 |
|
162 | 3.0% ±0.5 | 38 | 29 | 47 | 48 |
| #13 |
Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP
Claude 43
ChatGPT 75
Gemini 36
Perplexity 6
|
160 | 3.0% ±0.5 | 43 | 75 | 36 | 6 |
| #14 |
Liddle & Robinson
Claude 29
ChatGPT 73
Gemini 27
Perplexity 26
|
155 | 2.9% ±0.5 | 29 | 73 | 27 | 26 |
| #15 |
|
149 | 2.8% ±0.4 | 31 | 14 | 15 | 89 |
| #16 |
Valli Kane & Vagnini LLP
Claude 36
ChatGPT 1
Gemini 95
Perplexity 2
|
134 | 2.5% ±0.4 | 36 | 1 | 95 | 2 |
| #17 |
|
128 | 2.4% ±0.4 | 35 | 29 | 25 | 39 |
| #18 |
Lipsky Lowe LLP
Claude 15
ChatGPT 29
Gemini 12
Perplexity 68
|
124 | 2.3% ±0.4 | 15 | 29 | 12 | 68 |
| #19 |
|
124 | 2.3% ±0.4 | 49 | 27 | 15 | 33 |
| #20 |
|
117 | 2.2% ±0.4 | 4 | 113 | 0 | 0 |
| #21 |
|
116 | 2.2% ±0.4 | 49 | 60 | 3 | 4 |
| #22 |
|
113 | 2.1% ±0.4 | 54 | 3 | 22 | 34 |
| #23 |
|
110 | 2.1% ±0.4 | 46 | 0 | 61 | 3 |
| #24 |
|
109 | 2.0% ±0.4 | 11 | 29 | 60 | 9 |
| #25 |
|
108 | 2.0% ±0.4 | 108 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Ranks #26–#100 (75 more businesses) click to expand
| #26 | 103 mentions · 1.9% · 3/4 AIs | |
| #27 | 103 mentions · 1.9% · 1/4 AIs | |
| #28 | 99 mentions · 1.9% · 3/4 AIs | |
| #29 | 96 mentions · 1.8% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #30 | 90 mentions · 1.7% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #31 | 89 mentions · 1.7% · 1/4 AIs | |
| #32 | 87 mentions · 1.6% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #33 | 87 mentions · 1.6% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #34 | 84 mentions · 1.6% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #35 | 83 mentions · 1.6% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #36 | 83 mentions · 1.6% · 2/4 AIs | |
| #37 | 81 mentions · 1.5% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #38 | 80 mentions · 1.5% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #39 | 80 mentions · 1.5% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #40 | 80 mentions · 1.5% · 2/4 AIs | |
| #41 | 75 mentions · 1.4% · 1/4 AIs | |
| #42 | 71 mentions · 1.3% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #43 | 65 mentions · 1.2% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #44 | 64 mentions · 1.2% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #45 | 64 mentions · 1.2% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #46 | 63 mentions · 1.2% · 3/4 AIs | |
| #47 | 63 mentions · 1.2% · 3/4 AIs | |
| #48 | 61 mentions · 1.1% · 2/4 AIs | |
| #49 | 61 mentions · 1.1% · 2/4 AIs | |
| #50 | 60 mentions · 1.1% · 3/4 AIs | |
| #51 | 60 mentions · 1.1% · 2/4 AIs | |
| #52 | 59 mentions · 1.1% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #53 | 59 mentions · 1.1% · 1/4 AIs | |
| #54 | 58 mentions · 1.1% · 3/4 AIs | |
| #55 | 58 mentions · 1.1% · 3/4 AIs | |
| #56 | 57 mentions · 1.1% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #57 | 57 mentions · 1.1% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #58 | 56 mentions · 1.0% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #59 | 55 mentions · 1.0% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #60 | 54 mentions · 1.0% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #61 | 54 mentions · 1.0% · 1/4 AIs | |
| #62 | 52 mentions · 1.0% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #63 | 52 mentions · 1.0% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #64 | 52 mentions · 1.0% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #65 | 52 mentions · 1.0% · 3/4 AIs | |
| #66 | 51 mentions · 1.0% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #67 | 51 mentions · 1.0% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #68 | 51 mentions · 1.0% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #69 | 49 mentions · 0.9% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #70 | 48 mentions · 0.9% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #71 | 47 mentions · 0.9% · 3/4 AIs | |
| #72 | 47 mentions · 0.9% · 3/4 AIs | |
| #73 | 45 mentions · 0.8% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #74 | 45 mentions · 0.8% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #75 | 44 mentions · 0.8% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #76 | 43 mentions · 0.8% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #77 | 42 mentions · 0.8% · 2/4 AIs | |
| #78 | 42 mentions · 0.8% · 2/4 AIs | |
| #79 | 41 mentions · 0.8% · 2/4 AIs | |
| #80 | 40 mentions · 0.7% · 3/4 AIs | |
| #81 | 39 mentions · 0.7% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #82 | 39 mentions · 0.7% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #83 | 38 mentions · 0.7% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #84 | 38 mentions · 0.7% · 2/4 AIs | |
| #85 | 37 mentions · 0.7% · 3/4 AIs | |
| #86 | 36 mentions · 0.7% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #87 | 36 mentions · 0.7% · 3/4 AIs | |
| #88 |
Gair, Gair, Conason, Rubinowitz, Bloom, Hershenhorn, Steigman & Mackauf
www.gairgair.com
35 mentions · 0.7% · 4/4 AIs
|
35 mentions · 0.7% · 4/4 AIs |
| #89 |
Ending Forced Arbitration of Sexual Assault and Sexual Harassment Act of 2021
Unverified
35 mentions · 0.7% · 4/4 AIs
|
35 mentions · 0.7% · 4/4 AIs |
| #90 | 35 mentions · 0.7% · 2/4 AIs | |
| #91 | 34 mentions · 0.6% · 3/4 AIs | |
| #92 | 34 mentions · 0.6% · 2/4 AIs | |
| #93 | 33 mentions · 0.6% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #94 | 33 mentions · 0.6% · 3/4 AIs | |
| #95 | 33 mentions · 0.6% · 2/4 AIs | |
| #96 | 32 mentions · 0.6% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #97 | 32 mentions · 0.6% · 3/4 AIs | |
| #98 | 31 mentions · 0.6% · 4/4 AIs | |
| #99 | 31 mentions · 0.6% · 3/4 AIs | |
| #100 | 31 mentions · 0.6% · 3/4 AIs |
1,844 additional firms beyond rank 100 available via the JSON API (requires atlas API token).
No firms in this ranking match that search.
Request a scan
Don't see your firm above?
Most firms are tracked below the top 25 shown here — try the search bar at the top of the page first (Cmd+K). If your firm hasn't been scanned yet, tell us who you are and we'll add it. Result lands in your inbox, no account required.
Thanks — we've got your request.
We'll scan the assistants for your business and email the results to the address you gave. Usually within a week; sometimes faster if we're already scanning your vertical.
Sources cited by AI
Directories, associations, and other sources
These sources appeared in AI answers as places to research, verify, or compare businesses. We show them here because they helped shape the answers.
1. NYC Commission on Human Rights
59 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
2. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC)
24 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
3. U.S. District Court - Southern District of New York
nysd.uscourts.gov
13 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
4. Super Lawyers
11 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
5. Avvo
8 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
6. Martindale
8 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
7. 2026 Best Lawyers in America
7 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
8. New York State Department of Labor
new york state department of labor
6 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
9. NYC Bar Association Lawyer Referral
6 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
10. NYC Department of Consumer and Worker Protection
5 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
11. National Employment Lawyers Association (NELA) - New York Chapter
4 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
12. New York State Nurses Association (NYSNA)
4 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
13. NYC Department of Investigation
3 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
14. New York City Department of Investigation (DOI) - Office of the Inspector General
3 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
15. Yelp
3 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
16. NYC Bar Association
3 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
17. NELA (National Employment Law Association)
3 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
18. Supreme Court
2 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
19. NYC Department of Education
nyc department of education
2 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
20. Civil Service Commission
2 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
21. Appellate Division, First Department
2 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
22. New York State Unified Court System
courts.state.ny.us
2 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
23. American Diabetes Association
2 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
24. Federal and state court dockets
1 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
25. New York State court dockets
1 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
26. American Medical Association
1 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
27. New York State Attorney General’s Civil Rights Bureau
1 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
28. New York State Department of Health
1 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
29. New York State Unified Court System
1 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
30. Justia
1 source · 0 verification · 0 comparison mentions
These sources can reveal where buyers and AI assistants research the market. Source mentions are reported separately from business rankings.
Sample buyer responses
editorial · not counted in rankingsVerbatim responses from prompts that ask for advice rather than firm recommendations. Excluded from ranking calculations.
"I just got walked out of a tech layoff in New York City. I'm one of nine on my team who got cut — eight of us are over 50. The four under 35 all kept their jobs. I haven't signed a..."
Consider reaching out to an employment attorney to explore potential age discrimination claims. Here are some firms and attorneys in New York City known for employment law: 1. **Outten & Golden LLP** - Known for representing employees in discrimination and wrongful termination cases. 2. **Vladeck, Raskin & Clark, P.C.** - Specializes in employment law, including age discrimination. 3. **Lansner & Kubitschek** - Experienced in civil rights and employment discrimination. 4. **...
"I can't pay $500 an hour for an employment lawyer in New York City. I literally don't have it. I was just fired. Who actually works on contingency for people like me?"
1. Phillips & Associates - Known for handling employment discrimination cases on a contingency basis. 2. The Ottinger Firm - Specializes in employment law and often works on contingency for wrongful termination cases. 3. Outten & Golden LLP - Renowned for representing employees in various employment disputes, including those on contingency. 4. The Derek Smith Law Group - Offers contingency fee arrangements for employment discrimination and sexual harassment cases. 5. Cary Kan...
"Realistically, how long does an employment discrimination case take in New York City? Months? Years? Settlement vs trial — what's typical?"
An employment discrimination case in New York City can take several months to a few years to resolve. Settlements often occur within months, while cases that go to trial can take 1-3 years, depending on complexity and court schedules.
In-depth report
How AI recommends Employment Law (Plaintiff) in New York City
A written breakdown of the current snapshot — which firms each assistant names, how concentrated the recommendations are, and what a buyer would actually see if they asked ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini or Perplexity today.
Further reading
Pillar guide
AI Search Rankings: A 2026 Guide
How AI search rankings work and how to read a response-mention-rate leaderboard.
Playbook
How to Rank in ChatGPT
The exact structure and language that makes an AI reuse your firm as an answer.
Concepts
Generative Engine Optimization (GEO)
GEO vs AEO vs SEO — definitions, metrics, and limitations.
Field notes on reading these rankings
All notes →Why Your Law Firm Can Rank in Google and Still Be Invisible to ChatGPT
Google rankings reward pages built for keywords. AI recommendations reward pages that answer a buyer situation clearly enough to be reused in an answer.
How to Read AI Search Rankings (Beyond Vanity Metrics)
AI search rankings measure how often assistants like ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Perplexity name a business when a buyer asks who to hire. Read for share of vo...
How to Write Content That AI Assistants Actually Cite
Content that AI assistants cite looks different from content designed for humans or Google. It answers the buyer's exact question in a single quotable sentence,...
Don't see your business? Or ranked low?
See which prompts and assistants omit your business, then measure the effect of site changes.
Get a free AI visibility audit →Methodology v3.1 · latest snapshot: 800 AI responses and 22,870 business mentions · all-time corpus: 7,979 responses and 31,542 business mentions · Sep 27, 2026. 95% confidence intervals. Full methodology: viclaro.app/leaderboards/methodology.