New York City · Employment Law (Plaintiff)
New York State Department of Health
How to read this firm's data
How to read this firm's data
Header tiles
- Rank
- Position among firms named in the category's latest scan.
- Response mention rate
- The percentage of latest-snapshot AI responses that named this business. ±X is the 95% confidence margin.
- Cited by
- How many of the four AI assistants named this firm at least once.
- Tier
- 🟢 consensus · 🟡 mid-tier · ⚪ sample-limited.
Breakdowns + log
- 90-day trend
- Each dot is one category snapshot.
- Per-AI breakdown
- Responses from each assistant that named this firm.
- By question type
- Citations grouped by what the buyer was asking.
- Citation log
- Every recorded instance where an AI named this firm.
Rank
#19
of 320 firms
Response mention rate
1.8%
±1.2% (95% confidence)
Cited by
3/4
Tier
⚪ Sample-limited10 citations · consensus 1.80
Per-AI breakdown
Empty cards = that AI assistant doesn't surface this firm. A firm cited by only one AI is likely invisible to most buyers.
Claude
3
mentions
ChatGPT
6
mentions
Gemini
0
mentions
Perplexity
1
mention
By question type
Citations split by buyer-intent category. Empty rows = AI doesn't think of this firm when buyers ask that kind of question.
Citation log
10 mentions recorded for this business in the latest snapshot.
Where New York State Department of Health is winning + missing, prompt-by-prompt
95 of 100 ranking-layer buyer prompts don't cite this firm. The three firms cited most on each missing prompt are the competitors closing that gap. Prompt text is redacted (see methodology §8) — buckets show the shape of the gap.
P-001
Validation
Firms cited on this prompt:
P-002
Follow Up
Firms cited on this prompt:
P-003
Validation
Firms cited on this prompt:
P-004
Decision
Firms cited on this prompt:
P-005
Validation
Firms cited on this prompt:
P-006
Validation
Firms cited on this prompt:
P-007
Decision
Firms cited on this prompt:
P-008
Situation
P-009
Decision
Firms cited on this prompt:
P-010
Validation
Firms cited on this prompt:
P-011
Decision
Firms cited on this prompt:
P-012
Decision
Firms cited on this prompt:
P-013
Decision
Firms cited on this prompt:
P-014
Decision
Firms cited on this prompt:
P-015
Decision
Firms cited on this prompt:
5 winning prompts Prompts where AI cited this firm
W-001
Situation
Also cited on this prompt:
W-002
Situation
Also cited on this prompt:
W-003
Situation
Also cited on this prompt:
W-004
Situation
Also cited on this prompt:
W-005
Situation
Also cited on this prompt:
Peer firms in New York City employment law (plaintiff)
Other firms ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Perplexity name in this category.
#1
Outten & Golden LLP
27.8% share · 4/4 AI
#2
Wigdor LLP
23.6% share · 4/4 AI
#3
Sanford Heisler Sharp McKnight
13.6% share · 4/4 AI
#4
Vladeck, Raskin & Clark, PC
10.9% share · 4/4 AI
#5
Phillips Nizer LLP
8.9% share · 3/4 AI
#6
Phillips & Associates | Sexual Harassment, Discrimination, & Employment Lawyers
8.2% share · 3/4 AI
#7
Joseph Law Group, P.C.
5.1% share · 3/4 AI
#8
Terc Law Offices, P.C.
4.2% share · 3/4 AI
Want to climb the rankings?
We'll show you the exact content competitors published that earned their citations — and the specific answer blocks + schema markup for New York State Department of Health to outrank them.
Get a full audit →