Divorce & Family Law / New York City
Tarter Krinsky & Drogin
How to read this firm's data
How to read this firm's data
Header tiles
- Rank
- Position among businesses named in the latest scan.
- Mention rate
- The share of eligible AI responses in the current ranking that named the business.
Charts
- Rank trend
- Each dot is one published ranking, newest on the right. A flat line means this firm's rank didn't move.
- Per-AI breakdown
- Responses from each assistant that named this firm.
- By question type
- Mentions grouped by what the buyer was asking.
Practice context for Divorce & Family Law · Not yet reviewed
A sourced business description has not been added yet. Assistant mentions alone do not verify the firm's services.
Practice eligibility has not been reviewed for this market. This is unknown, not an exclusion.
Practice evidence and AI measurements are assessed separately. Mentions do not establish suitability.
Market detail: Divorce & Family Law · New York City
Position
#139
of 772 firms · Oct 14, 2026
Mention rate
0.4%
3 of 776 eligible responses
Rank vs mention rate
1 snapshot
One published snapshot (Oct 14, 2026). A trend line will appear here once a second snapshot is published.
Research details Historical appearances, assistant counts and question types · all roles, separate from qualified recommendations.
All-time results for this market
Business appeared Aug 5, 2026–Oct 14, 2026
- Responses analyzed
- 8,788
- Responses naming business
- 31
- Historical appearance rate
- 0.4%
- Dates with published rank
- 9
These raw appearance totals cover all retained responses for this city and category, across all question types and roles, including sources and incidental mentions. They are not qualified recommendation counts. Appearance dates show when responses named this business; published rank dates can include repeated use of those responses. Current rank and confidence use the latest dated ranking.
Per-AI breakdown
Counts cover all published Atlas research for this market.
- Claude
- 2 mentions
- ChatGPT
- 1 mention
- Gemini
- 25 mentions
- Perplexity
- 3 mentions
By question type
All-time mentions grouped by the type of question the buyer asked.
- Validation
- 8 mentions
- Situation
- 9 mentions
- Crisis
- 2 mentions
- Advice
- 4 mentions
- Constraints
- 4 mentions
- Decision
- 4 mentions
Peer firms in New York City divorce & family law
Current ranks and mention rates · Oct 14, 2026 edition.
#1
Aronson Mayefsky & Sloan, LLP
31.1% current mention rate · 4/4 AI
#2
Berkman Bottger Newman & Schein
27.6% current mention rate · 4/4 AI
#3
Blank Rome LLP
25.6% current mention rate · 4/4 AI
#4
Kasowitz Benson Torres LLP
23.3% current mention rate · 4/4 AI
#5
Chemtob Moss & Forman LLP
21.5% current mention rate · 4/4 AI
#6
Cohen Clair Lans Greifer & Thorpe LLP
18.0% current mention rate · 2/4 AI
#7
Cohen Clair Lans Greifer Thorpe & Rottenstreich LLP
11.9% current mention rate · 4/4 AI
#8
Eleanor Alter
11.6% current mention rate · 4/4 AI
Unclaimed listing — claim this profile
Atlas created this profile after AI assistants named the business. Claim it to confirm the business details; we'll reply from support@viclaro.app.
This firm in other markets
Each market has its own sample and dates. There is no overall firm rank; counts must not be added together. Other mentions do not verify services in those markets.
-
CPA & Tax
New York City · Finance
1 historical raw appearance · all roles
Aug 21, 2026 – Aug 21, 2026. No published rank; raw appearances do not establish a qualified recommendation rate.
View CPA & Tax market → -
Estate Planning
New York City · Legal
2 historical raw appearances · all roles
Jul 13, 2026 – Jul 13, 2026. No published rank; raw appearances do not establish a qualified recommendation rate.
View Estate Planning market →
Buyer questions and AI answers
Simulated buyer questions from Atlas’s test dataset, paired with AI answers that mentioned this firm or professional. Open to see the questions and what was said.
31 AI answers with recorded context · 0 reviewed in context
Atlas asks AI assistants questions written from the perspective of people seeking services in a particular city and situation. Each example connects a simulated buyer question to an answer that named this firm or professional. A name can appear as a recommendation, a related adviser, a comparison, or even an option the assistant advises against.
A mention does not verify services, eligibility or suitability. Context review explains how the name was used; it does not verify the assistant’s claims. Explore the test questions and methodology.
Simulated buyer question · Divorce & Family Law · New York City · Legal Looking at Cohen Clair Lans Greifer & Simpson for my high-asset divorce in New York City. Real read on them vs. the other top boutiques? Are they actually trial... perplexity/sonar 2026-10-14 14:41:07 How the name appeared: Uncertain Open question and AI answer
What the simulated buyer asked
Looking at Cohen Clair Lans Greifer & Simpson for my high-asset divorce in New York City. Real read on them vs. the other top boutiques? Are they actually trial lawyers or settlement-shop?
No name-matched excerpt is available; the extracted appearance needs review.
How to read this mention
The role of this name in the answer is uncertain or has not been reviewed.
Unreviewed contextual evidence; no qualification established.
Market: Divorce & Family Law · New York City · Legal
Factual accuracy: unverified · Practice fit: unknown
Context review: unreviewed. This is separate from practice eligibility and ranking.
No source URLs were recorded for this answer.
Simulated buyer question · Divorce & Family Law · New York City · Legal My current divorce attorney in New York City hasn't returned my call in 4 days. Is this normal? Should I switch? Who would I switch to? google/gemini-2.5-flash 2026-10-14 14:38:27 How the name appeared: Uncertain Open question and AI answer
What the simulated buyer asked
My current divorce attorney in New York City hasn't returned my call in 4 days. Is this normal? Should I switch? Who would I switch to?
…phisticated matrimonial and family law matters.
- Cohen Clair Lans Greifer & Thorpe LLP: Prominent firm handling high-profile and complex divorces.
- Morghan Richardson (Tarter Krinsky & Drogin LLP): Experienced in complex financial and custody disputes.
- Jacqueline Newman (Berkman Bottger Newman & Schein LLP): Highly regarded for her expertise in high-net-worth divorce.
How to read this mention
The role of this name in the answer is uncertain or has not been reviewed.
Unreviewed contextual evidence; no qualification established.
Market: Divorce & Family Law · New York City · Legal
Factual accuracy: unverified · Practice fit: unknown
Context review: unreviewed. This is separate from practice eligibility and ranking.
No source URLs were recorded for this answer.
Simulated buyer question · Divorce & Family Law · New York City · Legal I'm a pulpit rabbi in New York City. My wife is filing. My congregation cannot find out before the board meeting in October. Who handles clergy divorces where t... google/gemini-2.5-flash 2026-10-14 14:12:40 How the name appeared: Uncertain Open question and AI answer
What the simulated buyer asked
I'm a pulpit rabbi in New York City. My wife is filing. My congregation cannot find out before the board meeting in October. Who handles clergy divorces where the career exposure is the whole game?
- Morghan Richardson (Tarter Krinsky & Drogin): Known for high-net-worth and complex matrimonial cases, with an emphasis on discretion and reputation management for professionals.
- Bernard Clair (Clair Gjertsen & Weathers): Specializes in high-profile and complex divorce cases, often involving public figures and significant assets.
- Eleanor Alter (Kasowitz Benson Torres): Highly experienced in high-stakes, complex, and often contentious divorces, known for strategic litigation and protecting clients' interests.
- **Peter Bronstein (…
How to read this mention
The role of this name in the answer is uncertain or has not been reviewed.
Unreviewed contextual evidence; no qualification established.
Market: Divorce & Family Law · New York City · Legal
Factual accuracy: unverified · Practice fit: unknown
Context review: unreviewed. This is separate from practice eligibility and ranking.
No source URLs were recorded for this answer.
Selected examples from the test dataset are shown here. Excerpts show part of an answer; full response records remain part of the audit. Each market has its own question set and sample, so these examples do not establish an overall rank.
Field notes on reading these rankings
Turn this ranking into a decision.
Get the complete competitive gap, the public evidence behind it, and the three changes worth testing first.
Request the competitive brief →