Employment Law (Plaintiff) · New York City
Outten & Golden LLP
How to read this firm's data
How to read this firm's data
Header tiles
- Rank
- Position across all eligible AI responses in this market.
- Mention rate
- The share of eligible AI responses that named the business.
- Assistants, all time
- How many of the four AI assistants named this business.
Charts
- Rank trend
- Each dot is one week of analyzed responses, newest on the right. A flat line means this firm's rank didn't move.
- Per-AI breakdown
- Responses from each assistant that named this firm.
- By question type
- Mentions grouped by what the buyer was asking.
Own this business? Get a free ranking preview
Is this your firm?
Get a short preview showing one buyer question where AI assistants name Outten & Golden LLP or a competitor. Emailed from support@viclaro.app within one business day. See the paid brief format →
Mapped address
Find Outten & Golden LLP
Loading location map…
685 3rd Ave 25th Floor, New York, NY 10017, USA
Google verification signal — Powered by Google
Position
#1
pooled across every snapshot — 1,944 firms ever cited in this market
Latest snapshot (Sep 27, 2026): #1 of 772
Mention rate
43.3%
pooled across every snapshot — 2,316 of 5,343 eligible responses
Latest snapshot (Sep 27, 2026): 44.3%
Assistants, all time
4/4
Rank vs mention rate
7 weeks · 91 days
Rank #1 — unchanged across the window · mention rate 27.8%–46.4%
How to read: each dot is one week of analyzed responses. The green line shows the business's rank that week. The dashed amber line shows the share of responses that named it.
Rank and mention rate use different scales, so the two lines are placed side-by-side, not on top of each other. A firm can hold rank while mention rate drifts (fewer responses named anyone) or improve rank without moving mention rate (peers dropped out).
Per-AI breakdown
Counts cover all published Atlas research for this market.
Claude
all published runs
942
mentions
ChatGPT
all published runs
1132
mentions
Gemini
all published runs
1004
mentions
Perplexity
all published runs
173
mentions
By question type
All-time mentions grouped by the type of question the buyer asked.
Measurement window
All-time results for this market
Observed Jun 26, 2026–Sep 27, 2026
Responses analyzed
7,979
Responses naming business
3,251
Lifetime mention rate
40.7%
Ranked snapshots
16
These totals cover all analyzed responses for this city and category. Current rank and confidence use the latest dated ranking.
Peer firms in New York City employment law (plaintiff)
Other firms ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Perplexity name in this category. Ranks and mention rates below are from the Sep 27, 2026 edition — directly comparable to the "Mention rate, this edition" number above.
#2
Wigdor LLP
38.5% current mention rate · 4/4 AI
#3
Sanford Heisler Sharp McKnight
30.2% current mention rate · 4/4 AI
#4
Vladeck, Raskin & Clark, PC
25.2% current mention rate · 4/4 AI
#5
Phillips & Associates | Sexual Harassment, Discrimination, & Employment Lawyers
24.5% current mention rate · 4/4 AI
#6
Sanford Heisler Sharp, LLP
9.4% current mention rate · 4/4 AI
#7
Virginia & Ambinder, LLP
5.1% current mention rate · 4/4 AI
#8
Joseph & Kirschenbaum LLP
4.3% current mention rate · 4/4 AI
#9
Shulman Kessler
4.2% current mention rate · 1/4 AI
Field notes on reading these rankings
All notes →Why Your Law Firm Can Rank in Google and Still Be Invisible to ChatGPT
Google rankings reward pages built for keywords. AI recommendations reward pages that answer a buyer situation clearly enough to be reused in an answer.
How to Read AI Search Rankings (Beyond Vanity Metrics)
AI search rankings measure how often assistants like ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Perplexity name a business when a buyer asks who to hire. Read for share of vo...
How to Write Content That AI Assistants Actually Cite
Content that AI assistants cite looks different from content designed for humans or Google. It answers the buyer's exact question in a single quotable sentence,...
Turn this ranking into a decision.
Get the complete competitive gap, the public evidence behind it, and the three changes worth testing first.
Request the competitive brief →